Bug 595551 - Review Request: ibus-table-mathwriter - ibus-table-mathwriter provides input method for writing Unicode Math symbols
Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-mathwriter - ibus-table-mathwriter provides input ...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 630932
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: NotReady
Keywords: i18n
Depends On: 597035
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-05-24 23:21 UTC by Naveen Kumar
Modified: 2010-09-09 05:48 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

(edit)
Clone Of:
(edit)
Last Closed: 2010-09-09 05:48:35 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Naveen Kumar 2010-05-24 23:21:14 UTC
Spec & SRPM for F-13 & above:

Spec URL: http://nkumar.fedorapeople.org/ibus-table-mathwriter/ibus-table-mathwriter-1.0.0.20100521-1.fc13.src.rpm
SRPM URL: http://nkumar.fedorapeople.org/ibus-table-mathwriter/ibus-table-mathwriter.spec
Description: ibus-table-mathwriter provides input method for writing Unicode Mathematics symbols using IBus

Spec & SRPM for F-12
Spec URL: http://nkumar.fedorapeople.org/ibus-table-mathwriter-f12/ibus-table-mathwriter.spec
SRPM URL: http://nkumar.fedorapeople.org/ibus-table-mathwriter-f12/ibus-table-mathwriter-1.0.0.20100521-1.fc12.src.rpm
Description: ibus-table-mathwriter provides input method for writing Unicode Mathematics symbols using IBus

Hi! I would appreciate a review so that this package can get into fedora.

Comment 1 Caius Chance 2010-05-27 04:44:32 UTC
Hey Naveen,

As this is a GPLv3 licensed table, how about include that into ibus-table-others?

http://github.com/kaio/ibus-table-others/

I could add you commit permissions to the repository and pkgdb (once that is approved for CVS).

Comment 2 Naveen Kumar 2010-06-10 08:27:23 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hey Naveen,
> 
> As this is a GPLv3 licensed table, how about include that into
> ibus-table-others?
> 
> http://github.com/kaio/ibus-table-others/
> 
> I could add you commit permissions to the repository and pkgdb (once that is
> approved for CVS).    

Hi Kaio,

Sorry for replying late as I was on a leave for some time. I do not have any issues with adding it (ibus-table-mathwriter) to ibus-table-others. But I would need access (checkout & commit) to this table as the work is not fully complete yet. 

Also there is also something that I would like to add, that I might write an engine for mathematical input method using ibus API's in near future. In that case I would like you to suggest me the best possible course whether to merge it with ibus-table-others or keep it as a separate package.

Comment 3 Chen Lei 2010-06-10 08:55:09 UTC
> 
> Also there is also something that I would like to add, that I might write an
> engine for mathematical input method using ibus API's in near future. In that
> case I would like you to suggest me the best possible course whether to merge
> it with ibus-table-others or keep it as a separate package.    

If you want to write an new engine for ibus, then ibus-table-mathwriter seems not a proper name for this new engine. You may need another name for this package.

Comment 4 Naveen Kumar 2010-06-10 09:10:17 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> > 
> > Also there is also something that I would like to add, that I might write an
> > engine for mathematical input method using ibus API's in near future. In that
> > case I would like you to suggest me the best possible course whether to merge
> > it with ibus-table-others or keep it as a separate package.    
> 
> If you want to write an new engine for ibus, then ibus-table-mathwriter seems
> not a proper name for this new engine. You may need another name for this
> package.    

Yep, I think for the time being let us move it to ibus-table-others as I am not certain of writing it now. I will package it with different name then, because then it would be more than ibus-table-* & probably the behaviour & table format may also not be the same.

@kaio Please direct me with the next step.

Comment 5 Jens Petersen 2010-06-10 11:11:27 UTC
In that case probably you could close this bug or
reassign it to ibus-table-other to track the progress.

Comment 6 Jens Petersen 2010-09-09 05:48:35 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 630932 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.