Bug 60718
Summary: | RFE: Package dependency problem: A package providing libpisock.so.4 could not be found | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Toni Willberg <toniw> |
Component: | up2date | Assignee: | Adrian Likins <alikins> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Jay Turner <jturner> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.2 | CC: | gafton, mihai.ibanescu, srevivo |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2002-03-05 15:49:57 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Toni Willberg
2002-03-05 14:05:33 UTC
It would be nice to know which .rpm caused the dependency problem. I did not find any way to ask up2date to be more verbose. Something like -debug would be nice... libpisock.so.4 was never provided by Red Hat. It comes from pilot-link (the current Red Hat release is pilot-link-0.9.5-8). It's a conflict with the packages provided by Red Carpet. I will mark this bug as an enhancement request, since a sensible error message is indeed more useful. Feel free to change it back and provide us with more information if you notice something else is not behaving. |