Bug 607567
| Summary: | vncserver does not accept Xvnc switch | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | RHEL Program Management <pm-rhel> | ||||||
| Component: | vnc | Assignee: | Adam Tkac <atkac> | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Martin Cermak <mcermak> | ||||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||
| Priority: | urgent | ||||||||
| Version: | 5.3 | CC: | atkac, azelinka, dmair, fnadge, jwest, mcermak, ovasik, pm-eus, rkhadgar | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | ZStream | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||
| Doc Text: |
The VNC Server script didn't accept +option switches when specified before [:X] display number.
|
Story Points: | --- | ||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2010-07-27 08:24:34 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||
| Bug Depends On: | 494750 | ||||||||
| Bug Blocks: | |||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
RHEL Program Management
2010-06-24 11:44:24 UTC
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team. New Contents: The VNC Server script didn't accept +option switches when specified before [:X] display number. Created attachment 431981 [details]
RHTS test run log for unpatched package
Created attachment 431982 [details]
RHTS test run log for patched package
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0563.html |