Bug 611285 (pyvcs)
Summary: | Review Request: pyvcs - A lightweight abstraction layer over multiple VCSs | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Fabian Affolter <mail> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, jelmer, mario.blaettermann, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | mario.blaettermann:
fedora-review+
j: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | pyvcs-0.2.0-1.fc15 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-04-15 20:49:24 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 605423 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Fabian Affolter
2010-07-04 17:38:20 UTC
There is a license difference in your files: The spec file says BSD, the src.rpm says GPLv2+. According to the project page, the actual license is BSD, please keep this in mind for your further work on this package. $ rpmlint -v pyvcs* pyvcs.spec: I: checking-url http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/p/pyvcs/pyvcs-0.2.0.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -v pyvcs* pyvcs.src: I: checking pyvcs.src: I: checking-url http://pypi.python.org/pypi/pyvcs (timeout 10 seconds) pyvcs.src: I: checking-url http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/p/pyvcs/pyvcs-0.2.0.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. --------------------------------- key: [+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work --------------------------------- [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. - BSD according to the project page [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - Source rpm already contains the actual license [+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. $ md5sum pyvcs* 284caf99b824ec4848d642608736edfe pyvcs-0.2.0.tar.gz 284caf99b824ec4848d642608736edfe pyvcs-0.2.0.tar.gz.packaged [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - Koji scratch build was succesful. [.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, ... [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [.] MUST: When compiling C, C++, or Fortran files, %{optflags} must be applied. [.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. [.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ... [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. [+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application. [.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), ... [.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives. [.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream,... [+] SHOULD: Timestamps of files should be preserved. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - Koji scratch build available, see above [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [.] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [.] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg. [.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [+] SHOULD: Your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts. - Currently no manpage available. ---------------- Package APPROVED ---------------- Thanks for the review, Mario. (In reply to comment #1) > There is a license difference in your files: The spec file says BSD, the > src.rpm says GPLv2+. According to the project page, the actual license is BSD, > please keep this in mind for your further work on this package. Yes, the license is BSD. I will fix that. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: pyvcs Short Description: A lightweight abstraction layer over multiple VCSs Owners: fab Branches: f14 f15 InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). pyvcs-0.2.0-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pyvcs-0.2.0-1.fc14 pyvcs-0.2.0-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pyvcs-0.2.0-1.fc15 pyvcs-0.2.0-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. pyvcs-0.2.0-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. pyvcs-0.2.0-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. |