Bug 611527

Summary: [abrt] crash in nautilus-2.30.1-3.fc13: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Robert Hoekstra <redhat>
Component: nautilusAssignee: Tomáš Bžatek <tbzatek>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 13CC: tbzatek, tsmetana
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:b59078fbf6aa6a0347a73b6411af65cbca7b915c
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-09 15:14:30 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Robert Hoekstra 2010-07-05 12:56:59 UTC 
abrt 1.1.1 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: nautilus
comment: Not sure if this is easily reproduced, but I tried to extensively describe my actions when this occurred.
component: nautilus
crash_function: nautilus_window_get_active_slot
executable: /usr/bin/nautilus
global_uuid: b59078fbf6aa6a0347a73b6411af65cbca7b915c
kernel: 2.6.33.5-124.fc13.i686.PAE
package: nautilus-2.30.1-3.fc13
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard)

How to reproduce
-----
Unsure if it is reproducible, but here's what I did:
1. Started nautilus
2. opened second pane (f3)
3. opened SD storage card
4. Copied 7z file to sd card
5. Tried to unzip 7z file while no rpm was installed -> let it install on-the-fly
6. after unzipping: tried to 'eject' sd card, clicking on the eject icon
7. crash occurred.
Comment 1 Robert Hoekstra 2010-07-05 12:57:02 UTC 
Created attachment 429530 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 15:14:30 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 608517 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-11-09 15:14:30 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #608517.

Sorry for the inconvenience.