Bug 612671

Summary:	Review Request: nodm - A display manager automatically starting an X session
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Tom Atkinson <mail>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	christoph.wickert, fedora-package-review, michel, notting, pahan
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-06-15 20:01:26 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	201449

Description Tom Atkinson 2010-07-08 18:23:29 UTC

Spec URL: http://dl.iondrip.net/nodm.spec
SRPM URL: http://dl.iondrip.net/nodm-0.6-2.fc13.src.rpm

Description: An automatic display manager which automatically starts an X session at system boot. It is meant for devices like smartphones, but can be used on a regular computer as well, if the security implications are acceptable.

This is my first package, and I am seeking a sponsor.

This is a re-review since the package has been orphaned and was last updated more than 3 months ago. The original review request is bug #559559. The spec and srpm linked to above are unmodified.

Comment 1 Michel Lind 2010-07-11 12:41:49 UTC

Hi Tom,

Could you take a look at some of these and do the pre-review a couple of them? Provide the links to the bugs you pre-review and I'll then check your work, finish the review, and if everything is satisfactory, approve this request.

I normally sponsor packagers if during the review process they show they understand the packaging guidelines, but since in this case the package is being taken over unchanged, I'm afraid I need another way of gauging this understanding :) Plus this helps take a stab at the review backlog.

Cheers,

-- 
Michel

Comment 2 Tom Atkinson 2010-07-24 15:13:15 UTC

Hi Michel

I have done a pre-review of tidyp at #617524

Tom.

Comment 3 Tom Atkinson 2010-07-24 16:04:18 UTC

Also reviewed poezio at bug #617405

Comment 4 Michel Lind 2010-07-27 08:21:05 UTC

Thanks, I'll take a look later today.

Comment 5 Christoph Wickert 2010-07-29 23:44:08 UTC

Hi Tom, from a formal point of view, your review in bug #617405 is fine, however poezio is packaged badly. Just going through the checklist is not enough. I will review the package soon, then you see what I mean and can learn from it.

Comment 6 Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-02 02:07:29 UTC

Is anything happening here?