Bug 612671 - Review Request: nodm - A display manager automatically starting an X session
Summary: Review Request: nodm - A display manager automatically starting an X session
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-07-08 18:23 UTC by Tom Atkinson
Modified: 2012-06-15 20:01 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-15 20:01:26 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Tom Atkinson 2010-07-08 18:23:29 UTC
Spec URL: http://dl.iondrip.net/nodm.spec
SRPM URL: http://dl.iondrip.net/nodm-0.6-2.fc13.src.rpm

Description: An automatic display manager which automatically starts an X session at system boot. It is meant for devices like smartphones, but can be used on a regular computer as well, if the security implications are acceptable.

This is my first package, and I am seeking a sponsor.

This is a re-review since the package has been orphaned and was last updated more than 3 months ago. The original review request is bug #559559. The spec and srpm linked to above are unmodified.

Comment 1 Michel Lind 2010-07-11 12:41:49 UTC
Hi Tom,

Could you take a look at some of these and do the pre-review a couple of them? Provide the links to the bugs you pre-review and I'll then check your work, finish the review, and if everything is satisfactory, approve this request.

I normally sponsor packagers if during the review process they show they understand the packaging guidelines, but since in this case the package is being taken over unchanged, I'm afraid I need another way of gauging this understanding :) Plus this helps take a stab at the review backlog.

Cheers,

-- 
Michel

Comment 2 Tom Atkinson 2010-07-24 15:13:15 UTC
Hi Michel

I have done a pre-review of tidyp at #617524

Tom.

Comment 3 Tom Atkinson 2010-07-24 16:04:18 UTC
Also reviewed poezio at bug #617405

Comment 4 Michel Lind 2010-07-27 08:21:05 UTC
Thanks, I'll take a look later today.

Comment 5 Christoph Wickert 2010-07-29 23:44:08 UTC
Hi Tom, from a formal point of view, your review in bug #617405 is fine, however poezio is packaged badly. Just going through the checklist is not enough. I will review the package soon, then you see what I mean and can learn from it.

Comment 6 Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-02 02:07:29 UTC
Is anything happening here?


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.