Bug 612671 - Review Request: nodm - A display manager automatically starting an X session
Review Request: nodm - A display manager automatically starting an X session
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-07-08 14:23 EDT by Tom Atkinson
Modified: 2012-06-15 16:01 EDT (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-15 16:01:26 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Tom Atkinson 2010-07-08 14:23:29 EDT
Spec URL: http://dl.iondrip.net/nodm.spec
SRPM URL: http://dl.iondrip.net/nodm-0.6-2.fc13.src.rpm

Description: An automatic display manager which automatically starts an X session at system boot. It is meant for devices like smartphones, but can be used on a regular computer as well, if the security implications are acceptable.

This is my first package, and I am seeking a sponsor.

This is a re-review since the package has been orphaned and was last updated more than 3 months ago. The original review request is bug #559559. The spec and srpm linked to above are unmodified.
Comment 1 Michel Alexandre Salim 2010-07-11 08:41:49 EDT
Hi Tom,

Could you take a look at some of these and do the pre-review a couple of them? Provide the links to the bugs you pre-review and I'll then check your work, finish the review, and if everything is satisfactory, approve this request.

I normally sponsor packagers if during the review process they show they understand the packaging guidelines, but since in this case the package is being taken over unchanged, I'm afraid I need another way of gauging this understanding :) Plus this helps take a stab at the review backlog.

Cheers,

-- 
Michel
Comment 2 Tom Atkinson 2010-07-24 11:13:15 EDT
Hi Michel

I have done a pre-review of tidyp at #617524

Tom.
Comment 3 Tom Atkinson 2010-07-24 12:04:18 EDT
Also reviewed poezio at bug #617405
Comment 4 Michel Alexandre Salim 2010-07-27 04:21:05 EDT
Thanks, I'll take a look later today.
Comment 5 Christoph Wickert 2010-07-29 19:44:08 EDT
Hi Tom, from a formal point of view, your review in bug #617405 is fine, however poezio is packaged badly. Just going through the checklist is not enough. I will review the package soon, then you see what I mean and can learn from it.
Comment 6 Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-01 21:07:29 EST
Is anything happening here?

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.