Bug 620242

Summary: Review Request: python-ETSDevTools - Enthought tools to support Python development
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Chen Lei <supercyper1>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review, notting
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-29 18:27:24 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449, 620243    

Description Chen Lei 2010-08-01 14:06:03 EDT
Description:
The ETSDevTools project includes a set of packages that can be used during the
development of a software project, for understanding, debugging, testing, and 
inspecting code.

Links:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/python-ETSDevTools.spec
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/python-ETSDevTools-3.0.4-1.fc13.src.rpm
Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-01 23:09:00 EST
Builds OK; rpmlint says:

python-ETSDevTools.x86_64: E: no-binary
python-ETSDevTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary endo-readstate
python-ETSDevTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary endo
python-ETSDevTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ets_endo
python-ETSDevTools-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package

Are you sure this should be an arch-specific package?

With a license tag that complicated, you definitely need to indicate which part of the package is under which license.  Please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios

Nothing seems to own [...]/sitepackages/enthought