Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 620242 - Review Request: python-ETSDevTools - Enthought tools to support Python development
Review Request: python-ETSDevTools - Enthought tools to support Python develo...
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
All Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW 620243
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2010-08-01 14:06 EDT by Chen Lei
Modified: 2012-06-29 18:27 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2012-06-29 18:27:24 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Chen Lei 2010-08-01 14:06:03 EDT
The ETSDevTools project includes a set of packages that can be used during the
development of a software project, for understanding, debugging, testing, and 
inspecting code.

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-01 23:09:00 EST
Builds OK; rpmlint says:

python-ETSDevTools.x86_64: E: no-binary
python-ETSDevTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary endo-readstate
python-ETSDevTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary endo
python-ETSDevTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ets_endo
python-ETSDevTools-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package

Are you sure this should be an arch-specific package?

With a license tag that complicated, you definitely need to indicate which part of the package is under which license.  Please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios

Nothing seems to own [...]/sitepackages/enthought

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.