Bug 620242 - Review Request: python-ETSDevTools - Enthought tools to support Python development
Summary: Review Request: python-ETSDevTools - Enthought tools to support Python develo...
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review   
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW 620243
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-08-01 18:06 UTC by Chen Lei
Modified: 2012-06-29 22:27 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-29 22:27:24 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Chen Lei 2010-08-01 18:06:03 UTC
Description:
The ETSDevTools project includes a set of packages that can be used during the
development of a software project, for understanding, debugging, testing, and 
inspecting code.

Links:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/python-ETSDevTools.spec
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/python-ETSDevTools-3.0.4-1.fc13.src.rpm

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-02 04:09:00 UTC
Builds OK; rpmlint says:

python-ETSDevTools.x86_64: E: no-binary
python-ETSDevTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary endo-readstate
python-ETSDevTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary endo
python-ETSDevTools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ets_endo
python-ETSDevTools-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package

Are you sure this should be an arch-specific package?

With a license tag that complicated, you definitely need to indicate which part of the package is under which license.  Please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios

Nothing seems to own [...]/sitepackages/enthought


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.