Bug 624838 (APSB10-17)

Summary: acroread: multiple critical security flaws (APSB10-17)
Product: [Other] Security Response Reporter: Vincent Danen <vdanen>
Component: vulnerabilityAssignee: Red Hat Product Security <security-response-team>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: urgent    
Version: unspecifiedCC: jrb, mkasik, security-response-team
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-08-20 12:26:50 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 624839, 624840, 625503    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Vincent Danen 2010-08-17 21:22:41 UTC
Adobe has announced a forthcoming update to Adobe Acrobat Reader that will address critical security issues:

http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb10-17.html

Comment 2 Vincent Danen 2010-08-18 04:10:39 UTC
The bulletin addresses:

* These updates resolve an integer overflow vulnerability that could lead to code execution (CVE-2010-2862).

* These updates further mitigate a social engineering attack that could lead to code execution (CVE-2010-1240).

* These updates incorporate the Adobe Flash Player update as noted in Security Bulletin APSB10-16.

The first issue is tracked via bug #621687 and the Flash Player-related issues are tracked via bug #622947.

CVE-2010-1240 was previously noted to have been corrected in APSB10-15 (see bug #609203), so Adobe should have used a different CVE name here instead.

Comment 3 Tomas Hoger 2010-08-20 09:33:51 UTC
All the issue are public now via updated APSB10-17.

(In reply to comment #2)
> CVE-2010-1240 was previously noted to have been corrected in APSB10-15 (see bug
> #609203), so Adobe should have used a different CVE name here instead.

Yes, looks like and incorrect use of original CVE for what should have got a new CVE for an incomplete fix.  More details about the issue, including PoC PDFs:

Original discovery and 9.3.3 fix:
http://blog.didierstevens.com/2010/03/29/escape-from-pdf/
http://blog.didierstevens.com/2010/06/29/quickpost-no-escape-from-pdf/

Report that 9.3.3 fix is incomplete:
http://blog.bkis.com/en/adobe-fix-still-allows-escape-from-pdf/

Demo PDF files to not seem to trigger any launch file dialog on Linux Adobe Reader version.

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2010-08-20 11:41:04 UTC
This issue has been addressed in following products:

  Extras for RHEL 4
  Extras for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5

Via RHSA-2010:0636 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0636.html