Bug 630179

Summary: Review Request: cloud - Cloud.com CloudStack
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Rudd-O DragonFear <rudd-o>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: eli, fedora-package-review, kevin, lemenkov, notting, peder, rudd-o, supercyper1
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-24 10:42:39 EST Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On: 638418, 638419, 638420, 638421, 638422, 638439    
Bug Blocks: 201449    

Description Rudd-O DragonFear 2010-09-03 18:14:17 EDT
Spec URL: http://download.cloud.com/foss/fedora/proposed/cloud.spec
SRPM URL: http://download.cloud.com/foss/fedora/proposed/cloud-2.1.3-1.src.rpm
Description: Cloud.com CloudStack -- FIRST PACKAGE, SEEKING SPONSOR

I work at Cloud.com and I'm in charge of packaging.  Everyone here at Cloud.com is fully prepared to do the package modifications that your reviewers request from us.  This is priority zero for us right now, so we'll try and speed up the process as much as possible / give your reviewers' observations the fullest of our attention.
Comment 1 Chen Lei 2010-09-05 04:51:41 EDT
Several issues:

1. cloud should not ship  Pre-built JAR files or Other bundled software 

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Pre-built_JAR_files_.2F_Other_bundled_software


2.
The source0 should be a URL instead of a simply file name.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL
Comment 2 Rudd-O DragonFear 2010-09-07 15:13:06 EDT
Thank you VERY MUCH for your review of our package.  I will work on these issues now and I'll get back to you with updated packages that have no issues.
Comment 4 Rudd-O DragonFear 2010-09-28 16:51:42 EDT
Our package also requires XMLRPC3-3.1 to work.  I am updating the XMLRPC3 RPM in Fedora with the 3.1.3 sources and will post it here shortly.
Comment 6 Rudd-O DragonFear 2010-09-28 17:23:17 EDT
Updated cloud.spec (same URI as posted in first comment) and cloud SRPM (new URI:)

http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/foss/fedora/proposed/cloud-2.1.3-3.src.rpm

http://download.cloud.com.s3.amazonaws.com/foss/fedora/proposed/cloud-2.1.3.tar.bz2
Comment 7 Rudd-O DragonFear 2010-09-28 19:43:28 EDT
I've split the newly-packaged dependencies into five dependent bugs as requested by hicham in freenode/#fedora-devel.
Comment 8 Rudd-O DragonFear 2010-09-28 21:30:52 EDT
Please take a look at this package.  There are three known issues that I am working on:

1. split up httpcomponents
2. do not rely on the bundled ant
3. split up gcc.jar
Comment 10 Chen Lei 2010-10-14 02:29:19 EDT
Hi Rudd-O,
You should submit one package per Review Request.
I also suggest you to join Java SIG[1] and introduce cloud there in java-sig maillist to accelerate the review of the whole cloud stack.

[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Java
Comment 11 Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-24 10:42:39 EST
The submitter has failed to respond to review commentary on other tickets submitted at the same time as this one and which this ticket depends on.  Closing them all out.