Bug 638418

Summary: Review Request: ehcache (for cloud package in bug #630179)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Rudd-O DragonFear <rudd-o>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: akurtako, fedora-package-review, notting
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-11-24 10:38:52 EST Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449, 630179    

Description Rudd-O DragonFear 2010-09-28 19:41:16 EDT
Description: Cloud.com CloudStack dependency -- FIRST PACKAGE, SEEKING SPONSOR

Comment 1 Rudd-O DragonFear 2010-09-28 21:00:05 EDT
Fixed rpmlint warnings:

(the source URL cannot be fixed because the... not so clever release managers at ehcache decided not to include any build system in the sources they release.  so I basically ship with the same source as the JPP project)

Comment 2 Alexander Kurtakov 2010-09-29 04:20:31 EDT
I can review this one and sponsor you but I have few comments:
1. If we don't have a clear way where are the sources coming from or how to generate the tarball it's a nogo.
2. Choose only one of the build systems either ant or maven.
3. Always provide a unversioned javadoc and remove these post/postun sections for javadoc.
4. Drop gcj-support - we don't need it nowadays.
5. Ehcache has seen big restructuring - http://svn.terracotta.org/svn/ehcache/tags/ and http://ehcache.org/roadmap.html# and http://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/sourceforge-releases/net/sf/ehcache/ehcache/
6. Update to latest version - 2.2.0
7. Fix file attributes to the defaults for fedora.

And this is only from the first sight :).
Also if you drop gcj you won't need gnu-crypto.
Comment 3 Alexander Kurtakov 2010-11-09 11:15:35 EST
Are you still interested in getting this into Fedora or we should close the bug?
Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2010-11-24 10:38:52 EST
There was a comment, then more than a month passed, then a ping, and now more than a week has passed and there's been no response from the submitter.  That's what we consider as stale, so I'll go ahead and close out the stack of submissions.