Bug 639393

Summary: Broken dependency: qtgpsc-0.2.3-6.fc12.x86_64 requires libgps.so.18()(64bit)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Component: qtgpscAssignee: Fabian Affolter <mail>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 14CC: awilliam, collura, dcantrell, jlaska, mail, rdieter, rvokal
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: AcceptedNTH repoclosure_hash:05a78a0d89ec250a1b5b4f0f81663418678fa4144591e93839fc8db7cf6966d7
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-09-01 17:50:35 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 705039    
Bug Blocks: 642449    

Description Bill Nottingham 2010-10-01 16:05:03 UTC
Description of problem:

I note 0.3.0 is available... might be useful.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

0.2.3-6.fc12

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Jesse Keating 2010-10-01 19:32:36 UTC
the current version of qtgpsd we have no longer compiles against the version of gpsd we have.  Header files are missing.  Looks like moving on from what we have is necessary, or dropping qtgpsd since it hasn't been touched meaningfully since April of 2009.

Comment 2 Adam Williamson 2010-10-01 19:33:27 UTC
This was discussed during the 2010-10-01 blocker review meeting. We conditionally accept it as a blocker on the basis of a proposed new criterion which requires there to be no unresolved dependencies or unintentional conflicts in any package (not just packages on the media) for Final release. See http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-October/094302.html .

Comment 3 Adam Williamson 2010-10-08 17:21:28 UTC
After further discussion we agreed non-media dependency issues should be NTH, not blocker; downgrading.

Comment 4 James Laska 2010-10-12 13:56:15 UTC
Testing, please ignore this comment

Comment 5 Adam Williamson 2010-10-13 00:24:49 UTC

-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers