Bug 639440

Summary: Broken dependency: spacewalk-certs-tools-1.1.1-2.1.fc14.noarch requires spacewalk-backend-libs >= 0:0.8.28
Product: Red Hat Satellite Proxy 5 Reporter: Stephen Herr <sherr>
Component: InstallerAssignee: Miroslav Suchý <msuchy>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Red Hat Satellite QA List <satqe-list>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 540CC: msuchy, notting
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 639391 Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-10-04 08:22:28 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 639391    
Bug Blocks: 487677    

Description Stephen Herr 2010-10-01 18:29:09 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #639391 +++

Description of problem:

See subject.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

1.1.1-2.1.fc14

--- Additional comment from sherr on 2010-10-01 14:25:47 EDT ---

Don't know how high the priority on this should be, but this is actively blocking customers from installing RHN Proxy through the webui. This package is required to create the ssl tarball that the web installer requires.

--- Additional comment from sherr on 2010-10-01 14:26:36 EDT ---

Oh, didn't notice that this is a fedora bug, I will clone for RHEL 5.

Comment 1 Miroslav Suchý 2010-10-04 08:22:28 UTC
In Satellite and Proxy we have spacewalk-backend-libs (sub package of spacewalk-backend). In Fedora it is not there, because it did not pass review yet.
Therefore for RHEL it is NOTABUG

Comment 2 Stephen Herr 2010-10-04 14:20:50 UTC
You're right, and I should have been more specific. The original problem is that the package did not exist in the rhn-tools channels in webdev, and so caused dependency problems. However I just checked in production, and the package is in the proper channels. I should have checked production before I filed this. Concur with NOTABUG.