Bug 641261
Summary: | Review Request: openerp-server - Open Source ERP Server | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Andrea V. <vezza> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Dan HorĂ¡k <dan> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dan, fedora-package-review, leamas.alec, notting, pahan, swilmet |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | dan:
fedora-review?
|
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-04-08 14:35:56 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 641271 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 530643 |
Description
Andrea V.
2010-10-08 08:15:52 UTC
Files are not accessible. Sorry, my server has a configuration problem, you can find the files here: Spec URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:Openerp-server.spec SRPM URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:Openerp-server-5.0.14-1.fc13.src.rpm Last update (changed the .spec file using %{name} macro: Spec URL: http://vezza2.dyndns.org/openerp-server.spec SRPM URL: http://vezza2.dyndns.org/openerp-server-5.0.14-1.fc14.src.rpm Hm... I don't know if it's bad manners to hijack a tread like this... but I happen to have an updated spec file which possibly can be of interest. Please let me know if this the wrong way to handle it. Anyway, updated spec files for F14/6.01. I have updated versions also for web and GTK client, but I wait until I get some kind of response on this one. Spec: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17870887/openerp-server.spec RPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17870887/openerp-server-6.0.1-1.fc14.src.rpm PS: version 3344 of is actually worse than the released 6.0.1, but I guess there will be better versions before this review process comes to an end. Bhump? Maybe I should add https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641271#c10 , the reason I step in this odd way. Opening a new request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677639 Could someone involved with this please look at bug 693425. It would be really nice if everyone involved could work together instead of working at cross purposes. It appears that 693425 will proceed and this one hasn't received a response from the submitter since October. So I'll go ahead and just close this out. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 693425 *** |