This is my 1st package so I need a sponsor... Spec URL: http://vezza2.dyndns.org/openerp-server.spec SRPM URL: http://vezza2.dyndns.org/openerp-server-5.0.14-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Server components for openERP. OpenERP is a complete ERP and CRM. The main features are accounting (analytic and financial), stock management, sales and purchases management, tasks automation, marketing campaigns, help desk, POS, etc. Technical features include a distributed server, flexible workflows, an object database, a dynamic GUI, customizable reports, and SOAP and XML-RPC interfaces.
Files are not accessible.
Sorry, my server has a configuration problem, you can find the files here: Spec URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:Openerp-server.spec SRPM URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:Openerp-server-5.0.14-1.fc13.src.rpm
Last update (changed the .spec file using %{name} macro: Spec URL: http://vezza2.dyndns.org/openerp-server.spec SRPM URL: http://vezza2.dyndns.org/openerp-server-5.0.14-1.fc14.src.rpm
Hm... I don't know if it's bad manners to hijack a tread like this... but I happen to have an updated spec file which possibly can be of interest. Please let me know if this the wrong way to handle it. Anyway, updated spec files for F14/6.01. I have updated versions also for web and GTK client, but I wait until I get some kind of response on this one. Spec: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17870887/openerp-server.spec RPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17870887/openerp-server-6.0.1-1.fc14.src.rpm PS: version 3344 of is actually worse than the released 6.0.1, but I guess there will be better versions before this review process comes to an end.
Bhump? Maybe I should add https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641271#c10 , the reason I step in this odd way.
Opening a new request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677639
Could someone involved with this please look at bug 693425. It would be really nice if everyone involved could work together instead of working at cross purposes.
It appears that 693425 will proceed and this one hasn't received a response from the submitter since October. So I'll go ahead and just close this out. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 693425 ***