Bug 645752

(In reply to comment #0)
> This update is a correction to the dependencies required by the original
> packagen in koji system.

I'm confused...
You made changes to the original transifex package and you submit that now as a new package?

(CC'ing existing maintainers of transifex)

(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > This update is a correction to the dependencies required by the original
> > packagen in koji system.
> 
> I'm confused...
> You made changes to the original transifex package and you submit that now as a
> new package?
> 

Sorry for the confusion.
It is only a change to the transifex.spec file to add some missing dependencies, in order to make the package work out of the box for a translate.fedoraproject.org upgrade.
More info about this may be found in fedora-infrastructure ticket # 2389 [1].

[1] https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2389

Thanks.

Aah, you need to be packager to be able to co-maintain transifex.

So you are requesting changes from the current maintainers and you don't want a new package of transifex here in fedora...

-> reassigning to transifex

I'm making this a tracking bug, so you can block this bug with all the dependencies.

According to your ticket, it's:
1. django-ajax-selects-1.1.4 Relevant files: django-ajax-selects.spec, its tarball and it's src.rpm file are all at [1].
2. django-threadedcomments-0.5.3 Relevant files: django-threadedcomments.spec, its tarball and it's src.rpm file are all at [1].
3. django-staticfiles-0.3.2 Relevant files: django-threadedcomments.spec, its tarball and it's src.rpm file are all at [1].
4. django-addons-0.6.1 Relevant files: django-threadedcomments.spec, its zip file and it's src.rpm file are all at [1].

In #645759 you basically request an update of Django-south.

You should block FE-NEEDSPONSOR in all the review requests from above (packages, which are not yet in fedora), so a sponsor can find you and sponsor you.
(I'm no sponsor yet...)

See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored

Since we need these for infrastructure and the translation team and I've met Domingo, I'm going to sponsor him now.

Domingo, I've talked with gomix and he's willing to review at least some of your packages and be your primary mentor as a Fedora Packager.  I'm available to answer questions as well -- abadger1999 on irc and toshio.

Im on board for this task.

Bug #645759: it is complete, the package reached the stable repos.

Bug #645760: today I pushed the packages to updates-testing repos.

Bug #645761, #645762 and #645764: I pushed the packages to updates-testing repos some days ago.

Is it possible to have this package pushed to rawhide (f15) so I may continue testing all packages together from the repo?

New dependency detected.
Fixed some rpmlint warnings.

Spec URL: http://beckerde.fedorapeople.org/transifex/transifex.spec
SRPM URL:
http://beckerde.fedorapeople.org/transifex/transifex-0.9.0-3.fc13.src.rpm

New dependency detected.

Spec URL: http://beckerde.fedorapeople.org/transifex/transifex.spec
SRPM URL:
http://beckerde.fedorapeople.org/transifex/transifex-0.9.0-4.fc13.src.rpm

transifex-0.9.0-4.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/transifex-0.9.0-4.fc13

transifex-0.9.0-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update transifex'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/transifex-0.9.0-4.fc13

transifex-0.9.0-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/transifex-0.9.0-4.el5

transifex-0.9.0-4.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

transifex-0.9.0-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Spec URL: http://beckerde.fedorapeople.org/transifex/transifex.spec
SRPM URL:
http://beckerde.fedorapeople.org/transifex/transifex-0.9.1-1.fc13.src.rpm

The tarball for 0.9.0 was missing the media/css and media/images.

transifex-0.9.1-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/transifex-0.9.1-1.el5

transifex-0.9.1-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/transifex-0.9.1-1.fc14

transifex-0.9.1-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/transifex-0.9.1-1.fc13

transifex-0.9.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update transifex'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/transifex-0.9.1-1.el5

transifex-0.9.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

transifex-0.9.1-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

transifex-0.9.1-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.