Bug 651853
Summary: | pida 0.6.2 got released | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Fabian Affolter <mail> |
Component: | pida | Assignee: | Gwyn Ciesla <gwync> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | boni.vivek, lzap, maxamillion |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-02-06 16:40:56 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 695022, 745233, 767185 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 754673 |
Description
Fabian Affolter
2010-11-10 13:28:15 UTC
Trying to build it. At the first sight we are missing some dependencies: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/pygtkhelpers http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Logbook/ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695022 Working on changing pida spec now, will send patch to the maintainer. Built the SRPM for the pida-0.6.2 but it requires pygtkhelpers to run. The SRPM can be found at: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/pida-0.6.2-1.fc16.src.rpm Got some comments: - in the %setup the -n %{name}-%{version} is not necessary - chmod 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitearch}/%{name}/utils/feedparser.py should be python_sitelib because this can fail in 64bit systems - in the files section this is the same: %{python_sitearch}/%{name}/ %{python_sitearch}/%{name}-*.egg-info should probably be %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/ %{python_sitelib}/%{name}-*.egg-info - is it okay to have /usr/share/pida and /usr/share/pida-version ? I'd recommend this in the install section: # This should be installed with version tag mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/contrib/gtkrc mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}/contrib/gtkrc/dark.gtkrc-2.0 \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/contrib/gtkrc/dark.gtkrc-2.0 - the pida-build binary is also not necessary (install section): # Build script not necessary rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/%{name}-build For completeness I am attaching the lint output (version f14): $ rpmlint pida-0.6.2-1.fc14.i686.rpm pida.i686: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pida/ui/moo_stub.so moo_stub.so pida.i686: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/pida-0.6.2/docs/source/user/mooedit.rst pida.i686: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pida/services/plugins/multipart.py 0644L /usr/bin/python pida.i686: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/pida-0.6.2/docs/source/user/vim.rst pida.i686: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/pida-0.6.2/docs/source/user/emacs.rst pida.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pida-build pida.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pida-remote 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 3 warnings. Hi, I dont have any time to look into it currently so changing the status of asignee. Thanks, Vivek This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. Committed 0.6.2, not build, still waiting on pygtkhelpers review. I'll likely submit Logbook. pygtkhelpers and the new pida bundle other code in difficult ways, I've retired pida in rawhide. |