Bug 653674
| Summary: | Fails to create debug build of Qt projects on mingw | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ivan Romanov <drizt72> | ||||
| Component: | qt | Assignee: | Than Ngo <than> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | low | ||||||
| Version: | 14 | CC: | erik-fedora, fedora-mingw, itamar, jreznik, kevin, ltinkl, pahan, rdieter, rnovacek, smparrish, than, thomasj | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Patch, Triaged | ||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | qt-4.7.1-3.fc14 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2010-11-28 20:43:06 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Ivan Romanov
2010-11-15 22:19:42 UTC
So, my understanding is that the Fedora MinGW maintainers would like us to apply this patch to our qt package, is that correct?
If it is so, since it shouldn't affect anybody else, I'm OK with applying that patch to our Qt packaging. I'd prefer this to get sorted out upstream, but I'm OK with the patch if the MinGW folks are convinced it's right.
(I personally have some reservations about a variable named $${QT_LIBINFIX} being made a postfix though. MinGW folks: are you sure this makes sense?)
> So, my understanding is that the Fedora MinGW maintainers would like us to > apply this patch to our qt package, is that correct? That's correct > If it is so, since it shouldn't affect anybody else, I'm OK with applying that > patch to our Qt packaging. I'd prefer this to get sorted out upstream, but I'm > OK with the patch if the MinGW folks are convinced it's right. > > (I personally have some reservations about a variable named $${QT_LIBINFIX} > being made a postfix though. MinGW folks: are you sure this makes sense?) We've asked upstream in the mentioned bugreport what the correct behaviour should be (should the suffix be 'd4' of '4d'? where does the '4' come from?). Unfortunately we haven't seen any response to that question so our best guess is to work around it in the qmake mkspecs files for now until upstream provides more information. The win32 binaries provided by upstream all use the suffix 'd4' as well so our packaging looks okay from that point of view I guess that's enough justification for me, let's apply the patch. What do the other Qt comaintainers think? fine with me, let's do it. +1 qt-4.7.1-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt-4.7.1-3.fc14 qt-4.7.1-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update qt'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt-4.7.1-3.fc14 I installed qt-4.7.1-3.fc14.x86_64. I do test and it's now work. Thank! qt-4.7.1-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Removing external tracker bug with the id '14467' as it is not valid for this tracker |