Bug 653971

Summary: Reviews Request: openfetion - A Fetion client written using GTK2+
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Liang Suilong <liangsuilong>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review, msuchy, notting, supercyper1
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-19 05:47:42 EST Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On: 666190    
Bug Blocks: 201449    

Description Liang Suilong 2010-11-16 09:51:49 EST
SRPM: http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/openfetion-2.0.2-2.fc13.src.rpm
SPEC: http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/openfetion.spec
Openfetion is a Fetion client written using GTK2+, based on Fetion v4 protocol.

Koji Result:
F14: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2604205
Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2604091

On koji, it is built for F-14 target. But for Rawhide target, It does not work. I guess there is some problem of dbus-glib for Rawhide branch.
Comment 1 Michael Schwendt 2010-11-21 14:34:08 EST
A brief look at the spec file told me the following:

> Summary:		A Fetion client written using GTK2+

> %description
> Openfetion is a Fetion client written using GTK2+,
> based on Fetion v4 protocol.

Both %summary and %description could try to explain what "Fetion" is. For example:

  Summary: GTK2+ based client for the Fetion instant messaging protocol

And %description should expand on that. Just repeating a "Name" isn't helpful.

> %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}

Option  -n %{name}-%{version}  is the default.

> %files -f %{name}.lang
> %defattr(-,root,root,-)

Several directories are not included in the package correctly:



As a directory added to a  %files  section will be included recursively, you may need to include directories only with the  %dir  attribute.

> %files -n %{libname}
> %defattr(-,root,root,-)
> %{_datadir}/%{name}/resource/city.xml
> %{_datadir}/%{name}/resource/province.xml

Same here. Plus, you need to decide on directory ownership between this %libname package and the main %name package.

> %{_libdir}/libofetion.so*

This is wrong. Only the *.so.* files belong into the %libname package. The *.so symlink belongs into the -devel package.
Comment 2 Miroslav Suchý 2012-12-16 07:45:49 EST
Ping? Any progress here? Or we can close this review?
Comment 3 Miroslav Suchý 2013-02-19 05:47:42 EST
Stalled Review. Closing per:
If you ever want to continue in this review, please reopen or
submit new review.