Bug 655333

Summary: Review Request: tanukiwrapper
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Miroslav Suchý <msuchy>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: akurtako, fedora-package-review, notting, steve.traylen
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-01-10 14:35:12 EST Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449    

Description Miroslav Suchý 2010-11-20 09:51:47 EST
I would like to maintain this package. It has already been in Fedora, but has been orphaned and since last commit passed more then 3 month. Therefore according the policy it need to go through review again:
SPEC:
http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/tanukiwrapper.orig/tanukiwrapper.spec
SRC.RPM:
http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/tanukiwrapper.orig/tanukiwrapper-3.2.3-5.fc12.src.rpm

This is the version of tanukiwrapper which already has been in Fedora (last
update on July 2010). No changes from me.

I wanted to package latest version of Tanukiwrapper, but it changed license,
which is non-free:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org/msg00253.html
This is most probably non-intentional change and upstream may be willing to
release it under some free license, so I contacted them If they are willing to do
some change toward free license. But so far I wanted to get into Fedora version 3.2.3 which has been release under BSD license.
Comment 1 Steve Traylen 2010-11-24 15:51:51 EST
Given your introduction to this package and it's current state do you feel 
tanukiwrapper is well maintained?

Did you hear from upstream?

Steve.
Comment 2 Miroslav Suchý 2010-11-25 10:57:03 EST
> Did you hear from upstream?
No.
Comment 3 Alexander Kurtakov 2010-11-29 13:23:49 EST
There are a number of problems with the package and it can't go in Fedora in this way:
* you have to drop gcj
* javadoc post/postun should be removed
* jars should be installed unversioned 
* javadoc directory should be unversioned
* file permissions on doc suppackage are not defaults for no reason
* missing requires on jpackage-utils in javadoc but it installs in a directory owned by it

See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java for details.
Comment 4 Miroslav Suchý 2011-01-10 14:35:12 EST
I thought it will be much easier. I'm giving it up for now.
Comment 5 Miroslav Suchý 2011-05-24 03:34:20 EDT
If anybody stumble upon this bz - see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707132
for free fork of tanukiwrapper.