Bug 655333

Summary:	Review Request: tanukiwrapper
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Miroslav Suchý <msuchy>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	akurtako, fedora-package-review, notting, steve.traylen
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-01-10 19:35:12 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	201449

Description Miroslav Suchý 2010-11-20 14:51:47 UTC

I would like to maintain this package. It has already been in Fedora, but has been orphaned and since last commit passed more then 3 month. Therefore according the policy it need to go through review again:
SPEC:
http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/tanukiwrapper.orig/tanukiwrapper.spec
SRC.RPM:
http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/tanukiwrapper.orig/tanukiwrapper-3.2.3-5.fc12.src.rpm

This is the version of tanukiwrapper which already has been in Fedora (last
update on July 2010). No changes from me.

I wanted to package latest version of Tanukiwrapper, but it changed license,
which is non-free:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org/msg00253.html
This is most probably non-intentional change and upstream may be willing to
release it under some free license, so I contacted them If they are willing to do
some change toward free license. But so far I wanted to get into Fedora version 3.2.3 which has been release under BSD license.

Comment 1 Steve Traylen 2010-11-24 20:51:51 UTC

Given your introduction to this package and it's current state do you feel 
tanukiwrapper is well maintained?

Did you hear from upstream?

Steve.

Comment 2 Miroslav Suchý 2010-11-25 15:57:03 UTC

> Did you hear from upstream?
No.

Comment 3 Alexander Kurtakov 2010-11-29 18:23:49 UTC

There are a number of problems with the package and it can't go in Fedora in this way:
* you have to drop gcj
* javadoc post/postun should be removed
* jars should be installed unversioned 
* javadoc directory should be unversioned
* file permissions on doc suppackage are not defaults for no reason
* missing requires on jpackage-utils in javadoc but it installs in a directory owned by it

See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java for details.

Comment 4 Miroslav Suchý 2011-01-10 19:35:12 UTC

I thought it will be much easier. I'm giving it up for now.

Comment 5 Miroslav Suchý 2011-05-24 07:34:20 UTC

If anybody stumble upon this bz - see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707132
for free fork of tanukiwrapper.