Bug 65556
Summary: | misspelling in package summary | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Brent Fox <bfox> |
Component: | mew | Assignee: | Akira TAGOH <tagoh> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.3 | CC: | tammy.c.fox, teg |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2002-05-28 19:52:01 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Brent Fox
2002-05-27 15:30:12 UTC
I fixed the misspelled words in specspo/dist/C.po for mew-common and mew-xemacs. It should be fixed in the spec file also if the error is duplicated. I think 'Emacsen' is proper. 'Emacsen' means all emacs series. it's used popularly. Search it with any search engines. Misspelling issue: the .spec file this package has is no problem. so I reassign it to specspo. 'Emacsen' may be popular, but it's certainly not the proper English way to refer all Emacs series. Why not just say 'all versions of Emacs'? For example, 'boxen' is a popular way to refer to lots of machines, but you certainly won't see "You can use kickstart to script the install on many boxen" in the Red Hat documentation. 'Emacsen' is slang, and we don't use slang (not even hacker slang) in our docs; we shouldn't do it in spec files either. Reassigning back to mew. the description was fixed on 2.2-5. |