Bug 657274
Summary: | perl-GSSAPI rebuild fails with mock and rpmbuild, x86_64, perl-GSSAPI-0.26-5.el6 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Sergio Rubio <rubiojr> | ||||
Component: | perl-GSSAPI | Assignee: | Petr Pisar <ppisar> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Karel Srot <ksrot> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | low | ||||||
Version: | 6.0 | CC: | herrold, lfarkas, ovasik, stephan.wiesand | ||||
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | EasyFix, Patch | ||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | perl-GSSAPI-0.26-6.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
Doc Text: |
Cause:
Rebuilding perl-GSSAPI package.
Consequence:
The package cannot be built because the spec file
utilizes file which has been removed from krb5-devel
package.
Fix:
The spec file has been adjusted to current krb5-devel
files.
Result:
perl-GSSAPI can be built against current krb5-devel in
RHEL-6 environment now.
|
Story Points: | --- | ||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2012-10-04 12:21:20 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Sergio Rubio
2010-11-25 11:09:12 UTC
This package has been compiled before krb5-devel update making /etc/profile.d/krb5-devel.sh obsolete. This flaw will be fixed once perl-GSSAPI package recompilation will be required. Created attachment 462879 [details]
Fix from Fedora
*** Bug 661796 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1340.html |