RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 657274 - perl-GSSAPI rebuild fails with mock and rpmbuild, x86_64, perl-GSSAPI-0.26-5.el6
Summary: perl-GSSAPI rebuild fails with mock and rpmbuild, x86_64, perl-GSSAPI-0.26-5.el6
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: perl-GSSAPI
Version: 6.0
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Petr Pisar
QA Contact: Karel Srot
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 661796 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-11-25 11:09 UTC by Sergio Rubio
Modified: 2013-01-15 06:57 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: perl-GSSAPI-0.26-6.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause: Rebuilding perl-GSSAPI package. Consequence: The package cannot be built because the spec file utilizes file which has been removed from krb5-devel package. Fix: The spec file has been adjusted to current krb5-devel files. Result: perl-GSSAPI can be built against current krb5-devel in RHEL-6 environment now.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-10-04 12:21:20 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Fix from Fedora (1.40 KB, patch)
2010-11-25 12:13 UTC, Petr Pisar
no flags Details | Diff


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2012:1340 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE perl-GSSAPI bug fix update 2012-10-04 16:15:02 UTC

Description Sergio Rubio 2010-11-25 11:09:12 UTC
Description of problem:
+ . /etc/profile.d/krb5-devel.sh
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.6qJsU5: line 32: /etc/profile.d/krb5-devel.sh: No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.6qJsU5 (%build)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-GSSAPI-0.26-5

How reproducible:
Always 

Steps to Reproduce:
try to rebuild with mock or rpmbuild
  
Actual results:
fails

Expected results:
fails

Additional info:

Comment 2 Petr Pisar 2010-11-25 12:11:42 UTC
This package has been compiled before krb5-devel update making /etc/profile.d/krb5-devel.sh obsolete. This flaw will be fixed once perl-GSSAPI package recompilation will be required.

Comment 3 Petr Pisar 2010-11-25 12:13:58 UTC
Created attachment 462879 [details]
Fix from Fedora

Comment 4 Petr Pisar 2010-12-09 17:14:55 UTC
*** Bug 661796 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2012-10-04 12:21:20 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1340.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.