Bug 657746
Summary: | Please branch for el6 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michel Lind <michel> |
Component: | flim | Assignee: | Michel Lind <michel> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | petersen |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | j:
fedora-cvs+
|
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | flim-1.14.9-1.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-04-15 17:57:18 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 657745 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 614329 |
Description
Michel Lind
2010-11-27 17:01:15 UTC
Sure that is fine, please go ahead. I had almost forgotten I still own the package... <blush/> if you are willing to be comaintainer or owner for fedora too you are more than welcome. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: flim New Branches: el6 Owners: salimma petersen InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). Thanks! Well, I'm a second-order user of this package (flim->emacs-common-w3m->pure) so I'd be happy to just co-maintain. Sure, Michel, feel free to apply for comaintainership or I can add you if you wish. Thanks, again. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2635378 Assign to you for the el6 build, thanks! flim depends on apel, and I forgot to make this request depend on the apel/EL-6 request. Building now, will post the link here when I submit the update. Should we work on renaming flim to emacs-flim to match the new guidelines next? I can review it, or if you no longer use flim, I can submit the request and you can review it. Thanks, -- Michel (In reply to comment #6) > Should we work on renaming flim to emacs-flim to match the new guidelines next? > I can review it, or if you no longer use flim, I can submit the request and you > can review it. Yes, that is bug 658338. Feel free to submit a package for review. Sure I could help to review it. I would be happy if someone can take over emacs-flim - I didn't really have time for maintaining flim any more. flim-1.14.9-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flim-1.14.9-1.el6 flim-1.14.9-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. flim-1.14.9-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. |