Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 658036

Summary: [fix available] File conflicts between vigra-devel multilib packages in Optional repo
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Alexander Todorov <atodorov>
Component: vigraAssignee: Caolan McNamara <caolanm>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: BaseOS QE - Apps <qe-baseos-apps>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.0CC: bnater, dgregor, jstodola, mbanas, riek, tcallawa, tlavigne
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 644778 Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-22 09:19:13 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 658038    
Bug Blocks: 644778, 658034    
Attachments:
Description Flags
like so none

Description Alexander Todorov 2010-11-29 08:22:50 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #644778 +++

Description of problem:
There is a file conflict between many packages (i386 and x86_64) in the optional repository for the Workstation variant, x86_64 arch.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHEL6.0-20100922.1 
yum-3.2.27-14.el6.noarch

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Do yum localinstall *.rpm inside the optional repository
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
Multiple file conflicts, transaction aborted.

Expected results:
No conflicts

Additional info:
WIll post the entire log in the next comment.

--- Additional comment from atodorov on 2010-10-20 12:05:41 EEST ---

Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test


Transaction Check Error:
  file /usr/bin/vigra-config conflicts between attempted installs of vigra-devel-1.6.0-2.1.el6.i686 and vigra-devel-1.6.0-2.1.el6.x86_64
-------------

--- Additional comment from atodorov on 2010-10-20 14:02:24 EEST ---

For the conflicting documentation files see bug #449731 (RHEL4) - it requested that rpm ignores file conflicts under /usr/share/doc to work around several multilib conflicts on ia64.

Comment 1 Caolan McNamara 2010-11-29 10:25:30 UTC
Created attachment 463457 [details]
like so

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2011-01-07 15:36:26 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to
address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to
ask your support representative to propose this request, if
appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an
exception in the current release, please ask your support
representative.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2011-07-06 00:02:01 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to
address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to
ask your support representative to propose this request, if
appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an
exception in the current release, please ask your support
representative.

Comment 6 Suzanne Logcher 2012-02-14 23:04:54 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to
address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to
ask your support representative to propose this request, if
appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an
exception in the current release, please ask your support
representative.