Bug 658049

Summary: File conflicts between ocaml-gettext-devel multilib packages in Optional repo
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Alexander Todorov <atodorov>
Component: ocaml-gettextAssignee: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: qe-baseos-tools-bugs
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.0   
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 644778 Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-08-23 17:55:05 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 644778    

Description Alexander Todorov 2010-11-29 08:47:57 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #644778 +++

Description of problem:
There is a file conflict between many packages (i386 and x86_64) in the optional repository for the Workstation variant, x86_64 arch.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHEL6.0-20100922.1 
yum-3.2.27-14.el6.noarch

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Do yum localinstall *.rpm inside the optional repository
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
Multiple file conflicts, transaction aborted.

Expected results:
No conflicts

Additional info:
WIll post the entire log in the next comment.

--- Additional comment from atodorov on 2010-10-20 12:05:41 EEST ---

Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test


Transaction Check Error:
  file /usr/bin/ocaml-xgettext conflicts between attempted installs of ocaml-gettext-devel-0.3.3-3.5.el6.x86_64 and ocaml-gettext-devel-0.3.3-3.5.el6.i686
--- Additional comment from atodorov on 2010-10-20 14:02:24 EEST ---

For the conflicting documentation files see bug #449731 (RHEL4) - it requested that rpm ignores file conflicts under /usr/share/doc to work around several multilib conflicts on ia64.
Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2011-01-07 16:02:28 UTC 
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to
address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to
ask your support representative to propose this request, if
appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an
exception in the current release, please ask your support
representative.
Comment 2 Richard W.M. Jones 2011-12-06 08:38:51 UTC 
Strangely the conflicting file is an OCaml bytecode
file, and those ought to be identical.  I'll take a look
at this for 6.3.
Comment 4 Suzanne Logcher 2012-02-14 23:05:05 UTC 
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to
address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to
ask your support representative to propose this request, if
appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an
exception in the current release, please ask your support
representative.
Comment 6 RHEL Program Management 2013-10-14 01:14:00 UTC 
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unable to address this
request at this time.

Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if appropriate, in the next release of
Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Comment 7 Richard W.M. Jones 2016-08-23 17:55:05 UTC 
Not on the ACL and very low priority, so closing.