Bug 659950
| Summary: | Review Request: vgrabbj - A command-line v4l grabber | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Elad Alfassa <elad> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, mail, notting, panemade, terje.rosten |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-03-28 14:03:44 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 659951 | ||
|
Description
Elad Alfassa
2010-12-04 12:09:00 UTC
Some missing buildreq here? A koji build gives: configure: warning: *** libttf library not found! Disabled timestamp feature *** checking for freetype/freetype.h... no checking for freetype1/freetype.h... no checking for crc32 in -lz... configure: warning: *** freetype.h not found! Timestamp may be disabled *** yes checking for FtpInit in -lftp... no configure: warning: *** ftp library not found! Disabled ftp feature *** checking for ftplib.h... no checking for crc32 in -lz... configure: warning: *** ftplib.h not found! Disabled ftp feature *** (cached) yes Ref: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2643951&name=build.log i didn't enable ftp and timestamp features on purpose i tested it, and seems that with ftp feature, it won't compile, and i can't enable the timestamp feature because it requires older version of freetype (freetype1) which isn't in fedora. so it's ok to ignore these warnings. Just some quick comments: - All doc files (AUTHORS, ChangeLog, etc) should be mentioned in %doc - Man pages shouldn't have %doc - One line per BR and requirement makes the file more legible As i've said in bug #636819 comment 19, I'm dropping this review request because of dead upstream. Feel free to take over this review request if you like. |