Bug 659950 - Review Request: vgrabbj - A command-line v4l grabber
Summary: Review Request: vgrabbj - A command-line v4l grabber
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 659951
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-12-04 12:09 UTC by Elad Alfassa
Modified: 2011-03-28 14:03 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-03-28 14:03:44 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Elad Alfassa 2010-12-04 12:09:00 UTC
Spec URL: http://elad.fedorapeople.org/reviews/vgrabbj.spec
SRPM URL: http://elad.fedorapeople.org/reviews/vgrabbj-0.9.6-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description: "vgrabbj is a commandline tool that grabs an image from a 24-bit v4l device (like a webcam) and save it as a ppm, png or jpg file"

Comment 1 Terje Røsten 2010-12-04 19:46:44 UTC
Some  missing buildreq here? A koji build gives:

configure: warning: *** libttf library not found! Disabled timestamp feature ***
checking for freetype/freetype.h... no
checking for freetype1/freetype.h... no
checking for crc32 in -lz... configure: warning: *** freetype.h not found! Timestamp may be disabled ***
yes
checking for FtpInit in -lftp... no
configure: warning: *** ftp library not found! Disabled ftp feature ***
checking for ftplib.h... no
checking for crc32 in -lz... configure: warning: *** ftplib.h not found! Disabled ftp feature ***
(cached) yes


Ref: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2643951&name=build.log

Comment 2 Elad Alfassa 2010-12-04 20:22:39 UTC
i didn't enable ftp and timestamp features on purpose

i tested it, and seems that with ftp feature, it won't compile, and i can't enable the timestamp feature because it requires older version of freetype (freetype1) which isn't in fedora.

so it's ok to ignore these warnings.

Comment 3 Fabian Affolter 2011-01-05 08:48:32 UTC
Just some quick comments:

- All doc files (AUTHORS, ChangeLog, etc) should be mentioned in %doc
- Man pages shouldn't have %doc
- One line per BR and requirement makes the file more legible

Comment 4 Elad Alfassa 2011-03-28 14:03:44 UTC
As i've said in bug #636819 comment 19, I'm dropping this review request because of dead upstream.
Feel free to take over this review request if you like.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.