Bug 659959
| Summary: | pkg-config information incorrect | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Sjoerd Mullender <sjoerd> |
| Component: | libgcal | Assignee: | Mario Santagiuliana <fedora> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 14 | CC: | cdfrey |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | libgcal-0.9.6-5.fc15 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-06-29 21:56:54 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 713741 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Sjoerd Mullender
2010-12-04 12:55:10 UTC
I ran into this one too. It is easy to fix. Just remove the patch from the rpm spec file: libgcal--pc_include_fix.diff. The patch is no longer a fix, since this is mostly done by 0.9.6 already. - Chris This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. libgcal-0.9.6-5.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgcal-0.9.6-5.fc15 libgcal-0.9.6-5.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgcal-0.9.6-5.fc14 Package libgcal-0.9.6-5.fc15: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing libgcal-0.9.6-5.fc15' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgcal-0.9.6-5.fc15 then log in and leave karma (feedback). Thanks! The updated package solves my build problem. Thanks Chris, please leave a positive karma like explained in comment 5. Oy... I miss the days when actually fixing a bug and getting confirmation that it was fixed was enough to get it into a distro. :-) These days you can't even report a bug without setting up some account with a password you forget every time you need to report a new bug. And now we need two accounts, one on bugzilla and one on fedoraproject. I can now forget two passwords per bug. (Ubuntu is even worse... I can't even *get* an account on some of their services, due to some oddity in their server setups.) Does no one see what this is doing to random contributors? Does no one see what this is doing to Fedora? This bug still exists in Fedora 14. I know it's not your fault, but unless someone speaks up, this behaviour just keeps on going and going. :-) I added a comment, but had trouble signing up. Hopefully an anonymous comment is sufficient. I think two registration are necessary because in this way a person can report a bug without subscribe the Fedora Controbutors License Agreement and bodhi system permits to leave a positive or negative karma in anonymous way. If a contributor sign up the CLA and log in the bodhi the positive feedback is count and if the package receive 3 points it will push in stable. If the package receive no feedback I can push in stable after a week. For more info: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bodhi The new package for fedora 14 should resolve this bug, it works for me... libgcal-0.9.6-5.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. libgcal-0.9.6-5.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |