Bug 661783
Summary: | virt-top can't be rebuild in mock | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Levente Farkas <lfarkas> |
Component: | virt-top | Assignee: | Richard W.M. Jones <rjones> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 6.0 | CC: | ajb, amyagi, gren, kxiong, mishu, mshao |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | virt-top-1.0.4-3.3.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-05-19 14:11:03 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Levente Farkas
2010-12-09 16:20:28 UTC
You've got the RHEL Optional repository installed? i'm just check it on rhn and even rhn can't find anything ocaml-camomile. it seems rh forget it:-) even ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/ has no such source... I second this. I had to fetch the srpm from Fedora. What happened is we built virt-top, then decided that we didn't need ocaml-camomile in RHEL 6 (and dropped it), but didn't rebuild virt-top. In fact ocaml-camomile* is not needed to build virt-top, this is a bogus dependency. In RHEL 6.1 we will release a newer version of virt-top which doesn't have this dependency (along with many other changes). In the meantime you can just remove this from the spec file and it will build: -%ifnarch ppc64 -BuildRequires: ocaml-camomile-data -%endif Verified with virt-top-1.0.4-3.7.el6.x86_64 1.rpm -ivh virt-top-1.0.4-3.7.el6.src.rpm virt-top warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root ########################################### [100%] 2.Look at the spec file BuildRequires: ocaml >= 3.11.0 BuildRequires: ocaml-ocamldoc BuildRequires: ocaml-findlib-devel # Need the ncurses / ncursesw (--enable-widec) fix. BuildRequires: ocaml-curses-devel >= 1.0.3-6.1 BuildRequires: ocaml-extlib-devel BuildRequires: ocaml-xml-light-devel BuildRequires: ocaml-csv-devel BuildRequires: ocaml-calendar-devel BuildRequires: ocaml-libvirt-devel No ocaml-camomile* is required in the spec file. Verification is passed. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0720.html |