RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 661783 - virt-top can't be rebuild in mock
Summary: virt-top can't be rebuild in mock
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: virt-top
Version: 6.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Richard W.M. Jones
QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-12-09 16:20 UTC by Levente Farkas
Modified: 2011-05-19 14:11 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: virt-top-1.0.4-3.3.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-19 14:11:03 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:0720 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE virt-top bug fix update 2011-05-18 18:09:39 UTC

Description Levente Farkas 2010-12-09 16:20:28 UTC
can't be rebuild in mock because missing br: ocaml-camomile-data
the strange  thing this package totally missing from rhel-6?

Comment 2 Richard W.M. Jones 2010-12-09 16:35:27 UTC
You've got the RHEL Optional repository installed?

Comment 3 Levente Farkas 2010-12-09 17:10:22 UTC
i'm just check it on rhn and even rhn can't find anything ocaml-camomile. it seems rh forget it:-)
even
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/
 has no such source...

Comment 4 Akemi Yagi 2010-12-23 16:04:50 UTC
I second this. I had to fetch the srpm from Fedora.

Comment 5 Richard W.M. Jones 2011-01-06 11:59:21 UTC
What happened is we built virt-top, then decided that we
didn't need ocaml-camomile in RHEL 6 (and dropped it), but
didn't rebuild virt-top.

In fact ocaml-camomile* is not needed to build virt-top, this
is a bogus dependency.  In RHEL 6.1 we will release a newer
version of virt-top which doesn't have this dependency (along
with many other changes).

In the meantime you can just remove this from the spec file
and it will build:

-%ifnarch ppc64
-BuildRequires:  ocaml-camomile-data
-%endif

Comment 8 koka xiong 2011-02-22 03:21:46 UTC
Verified with virt-top-1.0.4-3.7.el6.x86_64
1.rpm -ivh virt-top-1.0.4-3.7.el6.src.rpm
virt-top               warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root
########################################### [100%]
2.Look at the spec file
BuildRequires:  ocaml >= 3.11.0
BuildRequires:  ocaml-ocamldoc
BuildRequires:  ocaml-findlib-devel
# Need the ncurses / ncursesw (--enable-widec) fix.
BuildRequires:  ocaml-curses-devel >= 1.0.3-6.1
BuildRequires:  ocaml-extlib-devel
BuildRequires:  ocaml-xml-light-devel
BuildRequires:  ocaml-csv-devel
BuildRequires:  ocaml-calendar-devel
BuildRequires:  ocaml-libvirt-devel

No ocaml-camomile* is required in the spec file.

Verification is passed.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 14:11:03 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0720.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.