Bug 662481

Summary:	ghc-neither-0.2.0 is available
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring>
Component:	ghc-neither	Assignee:	Ben Boeckel <fedora>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fedora, haskell-devel
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature, Reopened, Triaged
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-10-15 15:59:25 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	716610
Bug Blocks:

Description Upstream Release Monitoring 2010-12-12 21:44:15 UTC

Latest upstream release: 0.2.0
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.1.0
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/neither/

Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Comment 1 Ben Boeckel 2010-12-18 04:11:29 UTC

Not possible since other packages do not build against 0.2.0 yet.

Comment 2 Jens Petersen 2011-03-14 08:43:13 UTC

When do you think it might be possible?

If not soon, might be better just to close this Deferred say.

Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2011-03-14 09:14:59 UTC

Actually what does neither-0.2.0 break?

BTW seems persistent-0.4.x no longer depends on neither.

Comment 4 Ben Boeckel 2011-03-24 16:37:08 UTC

Built for rawhide.

Comment 5 Ben Boeckel 2011-03-24 23:37:43 UTC

Failed. Needs ghc-monad-peel. Will file an RR.

Comment 6 Jens Petersen 2011-06-28 02:39:42 UTC

It might be better to drop neither from f16 if nothing needs it?

http://packdeps.haskellers.com/reverse/neither

Comment 7 Jens Petersen 2011-10-15 15:59:25 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 740996 ***