Bug 664339

Summary:	Review Request: zarafa-webaccess-smime - Zarafa Webaccess plugin for S/MIME support
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fedora-package-review, mcepl, mcepl, msuchy, notting, tcallawa
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-02-19 10:46:57 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	201449

Description Robert Scheck 2010-12-20 00:00:39 UTC

Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/zarafa-webaccess-smime.spec
SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/zarafa-webaccess-smime-0.9-1.src.rpm
Description:
The S/MIME plugin allows users to send and receive signed and encrypted
e-mails over Zarafa Webaccess. For signing and encryption the plugin uses
the Mozilla Firefox certificate system at client/browser side. Receiving
encrypted, verifying signed, sending encrypted and/or signed messages is
supported.

Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2010-12-20 00:02:17 UTC

Upstream told me in an e-mail, that they will include the license headers into
the source code files at the next release. Further I was told in that e-mail,
that the release of this version is 0.9, even if it's mentioned nowhere at the
moment. Are these intentions good enough - especially the first one? So adding
Fedora Legal for now.

Comment 2 Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-12-20 15:15:27 UTC

Assuming that upstream clearly indicated the license in that e-mail, including a copy of the email as a Source# file (and then later as %doc in the package) should be sufficient in the interim.

Comment 3 Miroslav Suchý 2012-12-16 12:53:07 UTC

Ping? Any progress here? Or we can close this review?

Comment 4 Miroslav Suchý 2013-02-19 10:46:57 UTC

Stalled Review. Closing per:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
If you ever want to continue in this review, please reopen or
submit new review.