Bug 664339 - Review Request: zarafa-webaccess-smime - Zarafa Webaccess plugin for S/MIME support
Review Request: zarafa-webaccess-smime - Zarafa Webaccess plugin for S/MIME s...
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
Unspecified Unspecified
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-12-19 19:00 EST by Robert Scheck
Modified: 2013-02-19 05:46 EST (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-19 05:46:57 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Robert Scheck 2010-12-19 19:00:39 EST
Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/zarafa-webaccess-smime.spec
SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/zarafa-webaccess-smime-0.9-1.src.rpm
Description:
The S/MIME plugin allows users to send and receive signed and encrypted
e-mails over Zarafa Webaccess. For signing and encryption the plugin uses
the Mozilla Firefox certificate system at client/browser side. Receiving
encrypted, verifying signed, sending encrypted and/or signed messages is
supported.
Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2010-12-19 19:02:17 EST
Upstream told me in an e-mail, that they will include the license headers into
the source code files at the next release. Further I was told in that e-mail,
that the release of this version is 0.9, even if it's mentioned nowhere at the
moment. Are these intentions good enough - especially the first one? So adding
Fedora Legal for now.
Comment 2 Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-12-20 10:15:27 EST
Assuming that upstream clearly indicated the license in that e-mail, including a copy of the email as a Source# file (and then later as %doc in the package) should be sufficient in the interim.
Comment 3 Miroslav Suchý 2012-12-16 07:53:07 EST
Ping? Any progress here? Or we can close this review?
Comment 4 Miroslav Suchý 2013-02-19 05:46:57 EST
Stalled Review. Closing per:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
If you ever want to continue in this review, please reopen or
submit new review.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.