Bug 669196

Summary: Please move netatalk into EPEL repo
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Steffan <steffan>
Component: netatalkAssignee: Jiri Skala <jskala>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: aglotov, fedora, jskala, ovasik
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: netatalk-2.1.5-1.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-02-13 00:17:54 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Steffan 2011-01-12 20:56:13 UTC
Description of problem:
Please move this into the EPEL repo

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Steffan 2011-01-12 20:59:57 UTC
Correction. Please **ADD** this to the EPEL repository.

Thanks

Comment 2 Ondrej Vasik 2011-01-13 12:44:35 UTC
I guess this request should be done in Package review of netatalk - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226190 - as request for additional branch. Additionally - which EPEL ? I guess epel6 - as netatalk is in rhel-5 - but it is always better to specify all the information

Comment 3 Steffan 2011-01-13 13:19:40 UTC
Yes, EPEL 6, I believe. Its for CentOS 5. I was directed by Remi Collet to request this via this link:
http://forums.famillecollet.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1199#p1199
On there he cited the availability of the package via this link:
http://rpms.famillecollet.com/rpmphp/zoom.php?rpm=netatalk

Any help is appreciated!

Comment 4 Steffan 2011-01-13 13:24:33 UTC
Rereading your post and the linked post, I'm a bit lost where you are directing me to request this or is this something you already took care of?

Thanks!

Comment 5 Ondrej Vasik 2011-01-13 13:51:10 UTC
If CentOS 5, then I'm a bit lost, because netatalk is afaik included in RHEL-5 trees (and you would need epel5 branch) ... 
For epel6, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure#other ... and add scm request to the package review bugzilla I provided in comment#2 ...

Comment 6 Ondrej Vasik 2011-01-13 13:54:23 UTC
Anyway - ask Jirka if he is ok with maintaining epel6 branch if you are going to fill the scm request.

Comment 7 Remi Collet 2011-01-13 18:48:50 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> because netatalk is afaik included in RHEL-5 trees
I don't find it in EPEL nor RHEL (5.6) repository.

> and add scm request to the package review ...
This should be done by the package owner

Comment 8 Ondrej Vasik 2011-01-13 20:10:08 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > because netatalk is afaik included in RHEL-5 trees
> I don't find it in EPEL nor RHEL (5.6) repository.

You are right - I can't see it in the rhel-5.6 repository as well - so it's not included in the release. It was probably removed from the final component list in alpha/beta phase before GA. Sorry for confusion.
 
> > and add scm request to the package review ...
> This should be done by the package owner

Or by the one who will maintain the epel6 branch. It's not a rule that epel package has same owner as Fedora one.

Comment 9 Ondrej Vasik 2011-01-13 20:12:04 UTC
(sorry, I meant epel5 branch ... of course - but maybe epel6 too)

Comment 10 Steffan 2011-01-14 05:45:02 UTC
Ondrej,
I went to the link you said to make the request and when I clicked on the link:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls
to do so, its broken. Do you have another way? I emailed the author listed on the package, Jiri Skala, but I've received no response. Any other suggestions?

Comment 11 Jiri Skala 2011-01-19 15:51:28 UTC
Hi,
I've just requested getting netatalk into EPEL 5 and 6. The details are available here:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226190#c15

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2011-01-26 13:22:39 UTC
netatalk-2.0.5-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/netatalk-2.0.5-1.el5

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2011-01-26 13:22:46 UTC
netatalk-2.1.5-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/netatalk-2.1.5-1.el6

Comment 14 Jiri Skala 2011-01-26 13:27:20 UTC
Hi Steffan,
as you can see I've used netatalk-2.0.5 for epel 5 because there would have to be compat-db47 package in epel 5 to cover netatalk's dependency. This currently is not feasible.

Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2011-01-26 19:02:40 UTC
netatalk-2.1.5-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update netatalk'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/netatalk-2.1.5-1.el6

Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2011-02-13 00:17:49 UTC
netatalk-2.0.5-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 17 Fedora Update System 2011-02-13 00:22:04 UTC
netatalk-2.1.5-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.