Bug 672832

- rpmlint OK
- package must be named according to Guidelines OK
- spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK
- package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK
- package must be licensed with Fedora approved license OK
- license field must match actual license OK
- text of the license in its own file must be included in %doc OK
- sources must match the upstream source OK
- package MUST successfully compile and build OK
- architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla OK
- build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK
- handle locales properly with %find_lang macro OK
- shared library files must call ldconfig in %post(un) OK
- packages must NOT bundle system libraries OK
- package must own all directories that it creates OK
- permissions on files must be set properly OK
- package must consistently use macros OK
- package must contain code, or permissable content OK
- large documentation must go in a -doc OK
- %doc must not affect the runtime of the application OK
- header files must be in a -devel package OK
- static libraries must be in a -static package OK
- library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel OK
- devel package usually require base package OK
- packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives OK
- GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK
- packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK

rpm -qp --provides ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL-0.01-1.fc14.noarch.rpm 
perl(Perl::Critic::PetPeeves::JTRAMMELL) = 0.01
perl(Perl::Critic::Policy::Variables::ProhibitUselessInitialization) = 0.01
perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL = 0.01-1.fc14
rpm -qp --requires ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL-0.01-1.fc14.noarch.rpm 
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)  
perl(Data::Dumper)  
perl(Perl::Critic::Policy)  
perl(Perl::Critic::Utils)  
perl(base)  
perl(strict)  
perl(warnings)  
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1

FPC didn't agree with core installation path (yet). I can't approve it.

And what am I supposed to do now? To change the path to different value that's not standardized too?

(In reply to comment #2)
> And what am I supposed to do now?
To install to vendordir, like any other perl module in RH and Fedora does.

Updated package published:

Spec URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL/perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL.spec
SRPM URL: http://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL/perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL-0.01-1.fc16.src.rpm

Thank you, approved.

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL
Short Description: Policies to prohibit/require my pet peeves
Owners: ppisar mmaslano psabata
Branches: 
InitialCC: perl-sig

Git done (by process-git-requests).

Thank you for the review and the repository.