Bug 673545
| Summary: | Review Request: python26-virtualenv - Tool to create isolated Python environments | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Mark McKinstry <mmckinst> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Steve Traylen <steve.traylen> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting, steve.traylen |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | steve.traylen:
fedora-review+
j: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | python26-virtualenv-1.5.1-3.el5 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-03-20 18:53:19 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Mark McKinstry
2011-01-28 16:50:03 UTC
- Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
Yes python26-virtualenv, source bundle called virtualenv.
- Spec file matches base package name.
Yes
- Spec has consistant macro usage.
NO $RPM_BUILD_ROOT vs %{buildroot}
- Meets Packaging Guidelines.
YES.
- License
MIT.
- License field in spec matches
It does
- License file included in package
YES docs/license.txt
- Spec in American English
YES , indeed it is.
- Spec is legible.
Yes it is.
- Sources match upstream md5sum:
$ md5sum virtualenv-1.5.1.tar.gz ../SOURCES/virtualenv-1.5.1.tar.gz
3daa1f449d5d2ee03099484cecb1c2b7 virtualenv-1.5.1.tar.gz
3daa1f449d5d2ee03099484cecb1c2b7 ../SOURCES/virtualenv-1.5.1.tar.gz
- Package needs ExcludeArch
YES builds in koji.
- BuildRequires correct
YES
- Spec handles locales/find_lang
NONE
- Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.
NONE
- Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
YES
- Package has a correct %clean section.
YES
- Package has correct buildroo
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
- Package is code or permissible content.
- Doc subpackage needed/used.
Not needd
- Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
Fine
- Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
No devel.
- Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
None
- .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig
None
- .so files in -devel subpackage.
None
- -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
None
- .la files are removed.
- Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file
None
- Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
Koji
- Package has no duplicate files in %files.
None
- Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
No.
- Package owns all the directories it creates.
rpmlint:
$ rpmlint python26-virtualenv.spec /var/lib/mock/epel-5-x86_64/result/python26-virtualenv-1.5.1-2.el5.*
sh: /usr/bin/python2.6: No such file or directory
python26-virtualenv.noarch: E: devel-dependency python26-devel
python26-virtualenv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US workingenv -> workingmen, workingwomen, workingman
python26-virtualenv.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary virtualenv-2.6
python26-virtualenv.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US workingenv -> workingmen, workingwomen, workingman
sh: /usr/bin/python2.6: No such file or directory
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings.
Problems:
1) $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} present.
2) I find all the
sh: /usr/bin/python2.6: No such file or directory
given the .spec file is fairly hardcoded to python2.6 just hardcode the line containing this.
Thank you for the review Steve. > Problems: > 1) $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} present. Fixed. > 2) I find all the > sh: /usr/bin/python2.6: No such file or directory > > given the .spec file is fairly hardcoded to python2.6 just hardcode the line > containing this. Fixed. SPEC: http://mmckinst.fedorapeople.org/packages/python26-virtualenv/python26-virtualenv.spec SRPM: http://mmckinst.fedorapeople.org/packages/python26-virtualenv/python26-virtualenv-1.5.1-3.el5.src.rpm Scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2864693 Looks good. APPROVED New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: python26-virtualenv Short Description: Tool to create isolated Python environments Owners: mmckinst Branches: el5 Git done (by process-git-requests). Package python26-virtualenv-1.5.1-2.el5: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing python26-virtualenv-1.5.1-2.el5' as soon as you are able to, then reboot. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python26-virtualenv-1.5.1-2.el5 then log in and leave karma (feedback). python26-virtualenv-1.5.1-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python26-virtualenv'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python26-virtualenv-1.5.1-2.el5 python26-virtualenv-1.5.1-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python26-virtualenv-1.5.1-3.el5 python26-virtualenv-1.5.1-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |