Bug 674418

Summary:	Accessibility handles in for filter check boxes aren't accurate
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	J.C. Molet <jmolet>
Component:	subscription-manager	Assignee:	Justin Harris <jharris>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	J.C. Molet <jmolet>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.1	CC:	jharris, jkeck
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-05-19 13:39:21 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	568421

Description J.C. Molet 2011-02-01 20:01:15 UTC

Description of problem:

The accessibility names of the filters for "match my installed products" and "have no overlap with existing subscriptions" are currently "Not Installed" and "Overlap" respectively.  The names of the handlers seem to be the opposite of what the filter actually does.  This is probably due to the fact that the filters used to behave differently in previous builds.  It would be nice if these handlers were renamed as to avoid confusion.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
subscription-manager-gnome-0.94.3-1.git.10.aeee843.el6.x86_64

Comment 1 Justin Harris 2011-02-04 14:45:41 UTC

The handles are now (in order):
 * Match System
 * Match Installed
 * Do Not Overlap

Note that I changed the first check box as well (used to be "Match Hardware") to be closer to the current label.

In commit:  340aaf0f68968923baefb05c3b87a13ebc9f17c8

Comment 3 J.C. Molet 2011-02-18 16:30:07 UTC

tested as working in:

subscription-manager-gnome-0.95.1-1.git.15.c75e560.el6.x86_64

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 13:39:21 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-0611.html