Bug 675871

Summary: JBossAS plugins appear the same in menu
Product: [Other] RHQ Project Reporter: Rick Herrick <rherrick>
Component: Core UIAssignee: RHQ Project Maintainer <rhq-maint>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Mike Foley <mfoley>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 4.0.0.B02Flags: hrupp: needinfo? (rherrick)
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Windows   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Screenshot none

Description Rick Herrick 2011-02-07 21:51:18 EST
Description of problem:
Right-clicking on the platform node on http://localhost:7080/coregui/CoreGUI.html#Resource/10001 brings up a pop-up menu with an option for Import. Clicking that there are two entries for JBossAS Server. One is for 4 the other is for 5, which can be determined from the descriptions on the fields, but isn't apparent at the menu level.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rhq-server-4.0.0.B02

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to http://localhost:7080/coregui/CoreGUI.html#Resource/10001 (or other platform menu).
2. Right-click on the platform.
3. Go to Import.
  
Actual results:
Two entries for JBossAS Server.

Expected results:
One entry for JBossAS Server 4 and one entry for JBossAS Server 5.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Rick Herrick 2011-02-07 21:52:52 EST
This is probably related: once I add an instance of JBossAS 6 to my inventory, it appears under a node labeled JBossAS Servers. There's also another node for JBossAS Servers, which contains the Hostname RHQ Server on JBossAS 4.2.3. So the labeling is the same in either case, while it should be differentiated by JBossAS version.
Comment 2 Heiko W. Rupp 2012-06-06 11:55:15 EDT
I think this is solved in RHQ 4.4 (and perhaps much earlier already), as the 
type is now amended with the plugin name
Comment 3 Heiko W. Rupp 2012-06-06 11:56:01 EDT
Created attachment 589947 [details]
Screenshot