Bug 676007

Summary: Review Request: python26-configobj - ConfigObj for Python 2.6
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: Steve Huff <shuff>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: el5CC: lmacken, notting, package-review, steve.traylen
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-07-05 14:55:13 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449    

Description Steve Huff 2011-02-08 10:34:15 EST
Spec URL: http://people.hmdc.harvard.edu/~shuff/epel/python26-configobj.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.hmdc.harvard.edu/~shuff/epel/python26-configobj-4.6.0-1.src.rpm
Description: This is a port of the existing python-configobj package (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/python-configobj), built against Python 2.6.  It's intended for EPEL 5 only, since it's unnecessary on RHEL 6 and impossible on RHEL 4.

I have not submitted packages to Fedora or EPEL before; I'm looking for a sponsor.
Comment 1 Steve Traylen 2011-03-23 11:37:11 EDT
Hi Steve,

I'd like to see this package appear and can in principal sponsor you.
Have you submitted any more packages or provided any informal reviews.
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored
Comment 2 Steve Huff 2011-03-23 12:59:43 EDT
(In reply to comment #1)
> 
> I'd like to see this package appear and can in principal sponsor you.
> Have you submitted any more packages or provided any informal reviews.
> See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored

Heya Steve!  Thanks for your interest and support.

I haven't submitted any more packages via Bugzilla yet; I wanted to make sure I was following the procedure correctly first.  However, if you look in 

http://people.hmdc.harvard.edu/~shuff/epel/

you'll see specs and SRPMs for a few more python26-* packages that I rolled up and am waiting to submit.

I'd be happy to perform some package reviews; I see the links for finding them in the document you referenced.  When I do reviews, would you prefer that I post links in this ticket, or email you directly, or something else?

thanks,  
-Steve
Comment 3 Steve Traylen 2011-03-23 14:25:23 EDT
SteveH,
YOu are following the procedure just fine,  you just need to do a bit more of it basically. submit
a couple  more packages.

For informal reviews find what needs reviewing as you did and add your informal
reviews as comments to those bugs. Afterwards provide a link in here to build up a case for sponsorship.
SteveT
Comment 4 Steve Traylen 2011-06-08 16:26:24 EDT
SteveH,

Did you manage to do any reviews?

Steve
Comment 5 Jason Tibbitts 2012-07-05 14:55:13 EDT
No response in over three months and the URLs are invalid.  I'll just close this out.