Bug 676007

Summary:	Review Request: python26-configobj - ConfigObj for Python 2.6
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Steve Huff <shuff>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	el5	CC:	lmacken, notting, package-review, steve.traylen
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-07-05 18:55:13 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	201449

Description Steve Huff 2011-02-08 15:34:15 UTC

Spec URL: http://people.hmdc.harvard.edu/~shuff/epel/python26-configobj.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.hmdc.harvard.edu/~shuff/epel/python26-configobj-4.6.0-1.src.rpm
Description: This is a port of the existing python-configobj package (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/python-configobj), built against Python 2.6.  It's intended for EPEL 5 only, since it's unnecessary on RHEL 6 and impossible on RHEL 4.

I have not submitted packages to Fedora or EPEL before; I'm looking for a sponsor.

Comment 1 Steve Traylen 2011-03-23 15:37:11 UTC

Hi Steve,

I'd like to see this package appear and can in principal sponsor you.
Have you submitted any more packages or provided any informal reviews.
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored

Comment 2 Steve Huff 2011-03-23 16:59:43 UTC

(In reply to comment #1)
> 
> I'd like to see this package appear and can in principal sponsor you.
> Have you submitted any more packages or provided any informal reviews.
> See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored

Heya Steve!  Thanks for your interest and support.

I haven't submitted any more packages via Bugzilla yet; I wanted to make sure I was following the procedure correctly first.  However, if you look in 

http://people.hmdc.harvard.edu/~shuff/epel/

you'll see specs and SRPMs for a few more python26-* packages that I rolled up and am waiting to submit.

I'd be happy to perform some package reviews; I see the links for finding them in the document you referenced.  When I do reviews, would you prefer that I post links in this ticket, or email you directly, or something else?

thanks,  
-Steve

Comment 3 Steve Traylen 2011-03-23 18:25:23 UTC

SteveH,
YOu are following the procedure just fine,  you just need to do a bit more of it basically. submit
a couple  more packages.

For informal reviews find what needs reviewing as you did and add your informal
reviews as comments to those bugs. Afterwards provide a link in here to build up a case for sponsorship.
SteveT

Comment 4 Steve Traylen 2011-06-08 20:26:24 UTC

SteveH,

Did you manage to do any reviews?

Steve

Comment 5 Jason Tibbitts 2012-07-05 18:55:13 UTC

No response in over three months and the URLs are invalid.  I'll just close this out.