Bug 676007 - Review Request: python26-configobj - ConfigObj for Python 2.6
Review Request: python26-configobj - ConfigObj for Python 2.6
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
el5
All Linux
unspecified Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2011-02-08 10:34 EST by Steve Huff
Modified: 2012-07-05 14:55 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-07-05 14:55:13 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Steve Huff 2011-02-08 10:34:15 EST
Spec URL: http://people.hmdc.harvard.edu/~shuff/epel/python26-configobj.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.hmdc.harvard.edu/~shuff/epel/python26-configobj-4.6.0-1.src.rpm
Description: This is a port of the existing python-configobj package (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/python-configobj), built against Python 2.6.  It's intended for EPEL 5 only, since it's unnecessary on RHEL 6 and impossible on RHEL 4.

I have not submitted packages to Fedora or EPEL before; I'm looking for a sponsor.
Comment 1 Steve Traylen 2011-03-23 11:37:11 EDT
Hi Steve,

I'd like to see this package appear and can in principal sponsor you.
Have you submitted any more packages or provided any informal reviews.
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored
Comment 2 Steve Huff 2011-03-23 12:59:43 EDT
(In reply to comment #1)
> 
> I'd like to see this package appear and can in principal sponsor you.
> Have you submitted any more packages or provided any informal reviews.
> See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored

Heya Steve!  Thanks for your interest and support.

I haven't submitted any more packages via Bugzilla yet; I wanted to make sure I was following the procedure correctly first.  However, if you look in 

http://people.hmdc.harvard.edu/~shuff/epel/

you'll see specs and SRPMs for a few more python26-* packages that I rolled up and am waiting to submit.

I'd be happy to perform some package reviews; I see the links for finding them in the document you referenced.  When I do reviews, would you prefer that I post links in this ticket, or email you directly, or something else?

thanks,  
-Steve
Comment 3 Steve Traylen 2011-03-23 14:25:23 EDT
SteveH,
YOu are following the procedure just fine,  you just need to do a bit more of it basically. submit
a couple  more packages.

For informal reviews find what needs reviewing as you did and add your informal
reviews as comments to those bugs. Afterwards provide a link in here to build up a case for sponsorship.
SteveT
Comment 4 Steve Traylen 2011-06-08 16:26:24 EDT
SteveH,

Did you manage to do any reviews?

Steve
Comment 5 Jason Tibbitts 2012-07-05 14:55:13 EDT
No response in over three months and the URLs are invalid.  I'll just close this out.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.