Bug 677801

Summary: Broken dependency: perl-XML-Twig-3.37-2.fc15.noarch requires perl(xml_split::state)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: James Laska <jlaska>
Component: perl-XML-TwigAssignee: Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 14CC: cweyl, jturner, mmaslano
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: repoclosure_hash:b65629336d579da5b8b7ea1aed939dd0f59f35902c0c0806bb3d90e4d3b847e9
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-02-16 06:36:49 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 617261    

Description James Laska 2011-02-15 21:29:34 UTC
Added repo-1 repo from http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/15/x86_64/os
Added repo-2 repo from http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/testing/15/x86_64/
Added repo-3 repo from http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/branched/x86_64/os/
Reading in repository metadata - please wait....
Checking Dependencies
Repos looked at: 3
   repo-1
   repo-2
   repo-3
Num Packages in Repos: 23769
package: perl-XML-Twig-3.37-2.fc15.noarch from repo-1
  unresolved deps: 
     perl(xml_split::state)

Comment 1 Marcela Mašláňová 2011-02-16 06:36:49 UTC
Why do you create bug reports on F-14, when new RPM broke these things only in F-15? 

Also please notice that we are already receiving nagmails, in my case all broken Perl modules and bodhi messages. Now I have to go even through bugzilla and found all modules, which I've already fixed and they are delayed in testing.

Comment 2 James Laska 2011-02-16 12:38:17 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Why do you create bug reports on F-14, when new RPM broke these things only in
> F-15? 

This was a typo in my script ... fixed.

> Also please notice that we are already receiving nagmails, in my case all
> broken Perl modules and bodhi messages. Now I have to go even through bugzilla
> and found all modules, which I've already fixed and they are delayed in
> testing.

I understand and apologize for any inconvenience.  We have no other way to track release criteria blockers, other than bugzilla.  

The situation is made worse this week since F15 (aka Branched) is still transitioning into the proper repos.  Until that is completed, I have no way to include packages for which fixes may already be in progress.  Additionally, I intentionally exclude updates which may be available in 'updates-testing', since they are not guaranteed to be included in the release unless they receive the karma required *and* are associated with release blockers.

Please note, the F15 Alpha release criteria in question for this issue is ...

   "There must be no file conflicts (cases where the files in 
    some packages conflict but the packages have explicit 
    Conflicts: tags are acceptable) or unresolved package 
    dependencies during a media-based (CD/DVD) install"

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Alpha_Release_Criteria

Thanks for your understanding!

Comment 3 James Laska 2011-02-16 12:40:02 UTC
Properly marking as a duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 677179 ***