Bug 680715

Summary:	missing $ in patch
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski>
Component:	flashrom	Assignee:	Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	14	CC:	lemenkov
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	flashrom-0.9.3-3.svn1280.fc13	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-03-14 05:36:30 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Maciej Żenczykowski 2011-02-27 10:22:02 UTC

Just noticed while glancing at the flashrom src rpm (flashrom-0.9.3-1.svn1250.fc14)

flashrom-0001-Initial-commit-of-autotools-related-files.patch:

+# Check whether we need PCI support
+if test "$internal" = 'yes' -o \
+       "$rayer_spi" = 'yes' -o \
+       "$bitbang_spi" = 'yes' -o \
+       "$nic3com" = 'yes' -o \
+       "$gfxnvidia" = 'yes' -o \
+       "$gfxogp" = 'yes' -o \
+       "satasii" = 'yes' -o \
+       "$atahpt" = 'yes' -o \
+       "$drkaiser" = 'yes' -o \
+       "$nicrealtek" = 'yes' -o \
+       "$nicnatsemi" = 'yes' -o \
+       "$nicintel_spi" = 'yes' ; then
+       pci="yes"
+fi

- note the missing '$' in front of 'satasii'

[and the entire reason I was looking is because satasii doesn't appear to be built by default? why not?]

Comment 1 Peter Lemenkov 2011-02-27 10:29:18 UTC

Thanks for the report, Maciej - I'll provide fixed build in a couple of days.

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2011-03-09 11:32:36 UTC

flashrom-0.9.3-3.svn1280.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flashrom-0.9.3-3.svn1280.fc14

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2011-03-09 11:32:43 UTC

flashrom-0.9.3-3.svn1280.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flashrom-0.9.3-3.svn1280.fc13

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2011-03-09 11:32:51 UTC

flashrom-0.9.3-3.svn1280.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flashrom-0.9.3-3.svn1280.fc15

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2011-03-14 05:36:25 UTC

flashrom-0.9.3-3.svn1280.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2011-03-25 19:21:30 UTC

flashrom-0.9.3-3.svn1280.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2011-03-25 19:24:25 UTC

flashrom-0.9.3-3.svn1280.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.