Just noticed while glancing at the flashrom src rpm (flashrom-0.9.3-1.svn1250.fc14) flashrom-0001-Initial-commit-of-autotools-related-files.patch: +# Check whether we need PCI support +if test "$internal" = 'yes' -o \ + "$rayer_spi" = 'yes' -o \ + "$bitbang_spi" = 'yes' -o \ + "$nic3com" = 'yes' -o \ + "$gfxnvidia" = 'yes' -o \ + "$gfxogp" = 'yes' -o \ + "satasii" = 'yes' -o \ + "$atahpt" = 'yes' -o \ + "$drkaiser" = 'yes' -o \ + "$nicrealtek" = 'yes' -o \ + "$nicnatsemi" = 'yes' -o \ + "$nicintel_spi" = 'yes' ; then + pci="yes" +fi - note the missing '$' in front of 'satasii' [and the entire reason I was looking is because satasii doesn't appear to be built by default? why not?]
Thanks for the report, Maciej - I'll provide fixed build in a couple of days.
flashrom-0.9.3-3.svn1280.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flashrom-0.9.3-3.svn1280.fc14
flashrom-0.9.3-3.svn1280.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flashrom-0.9.3-3.svn1280.fc13
flashrom-0.9.3-3.svn1280.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flashrom-0.9.3-3.svn1280.fc15
flashrom-0.9.3-3.svn1280.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
flashrom-0.9.3-3.svn1280.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
flashrom-0.9.3-3.svn1280.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.