Bug 683780

Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gem-open - Open gems on your favorite editor by running gem open command
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jan Klepek <jan.klepek>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: csonpatki, fedora-package-review, james.hogarth, ktdreyer
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-12-04 02:14:55 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449    

Description Jan Klepek 2011-03-10 11:32:25 UTC
Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-gem-open.spec
SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-gem-open-0.1.3-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description: Open gems on your favorite editor by running a specific gem 
command like `gem open package`.

Comment 1 Prathamesh Sonpatki 2012-06-10 11:50:58 UTC
Informal Review

<prathamesh> .fasinfo hpejakle
<zodbot> User: hpejakle, Name: Jan Klepek, email: jan.klepek, Creation: 2009-03-18, IRC Nick: wwwnick, Timezone: UTC, Locale: en, GPG key ID: , Status: active
<zodbot> Approved Groups: cla_fedora cla_done packager fedorabugs cla_fpca
No need of FE-NEEDSPONSOR

+ OK
- NA
X Issue

X Required Ruby version not mentioned. Each Ruby package must indicate the Ruby   
  ABI version it depends .
  for eg. Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.9.1
+ Package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ Definition of  %{gem_name} in spec file matches with the name from the Gem's 
  specification.
+ Spec has consistent macro usage.
X Version is not matching with Gem's version.
X BuildRequires: rubygems-devel is not present.
+ Spec in American English.
+ Spec is legible.
+ Package has no duplicate files in %files.
X License field in spec doesn't match with source.
X No rpmlint output.
➜  rpmbuild  rpmlint SPECS/rubygem-gem-open.spec 
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
➜  rpmbuild  rpmlint SRPMS/rubygem-gem-open-0.1.3-1.fc17.src.rpm 
rubygem-gem-open.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.


+ Changelog.

Comment 2 Jason Tibbitts 2013-04-30 16:39:52 UTC
I can't tell which version of the ruby packaging guidelines to which this was written.  It certainly isn't the current ones since this package predates them, nor does it appear to be the ones which are current for any Fedora release.

Please consider updating this package to current ruby guidelines.

Comment 3 Ken Dreyer 2013-12-31 01:50:27 UTC
Hi Jan, are you still interested in packaging this?

Comment 4 James Hogarth 2015-12-04 02:14:55 UTC
As there has been no response to the needinfo from the requester in over a week this bug is being closed as per policy.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews