Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-gem-open.spec SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-gem-open-0.1.3-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Open gems on your favorite editor by running a specific gem command like `gem open package`.
Informal Review <prathamesh> .fasinfo hpejakle <zodbot> User: hpejakle, Name: Jan Klepek, email: jan.klepek, Creation: 2009-03-18, IRC Nick: wwwnick, Timezone: UTC, Locale: en, GPG key ID: , Status: active <zodbot> Approved Groups: cla_fedora cla_done packager fedorabugs cla_fpca No need of FE-NEEDSPONSOR + OK - NA X Issue X Required Ruby version not mentioned. Each Ruby package must indicate the Ruby ABI version it depends . for eg. Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.9.1 + Package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + Definition of %{gem_name} in spec file matches with the name from the Gem's specification. + Spec has consistent macro usage. X Version is not matching with Gem's version. X BuildRequires: rubygems-devel is not present. + Spec in American English. + Spec is legible. + Package has no duplicate files in %files. X License field in spec doesn't match with source. X No rpmlint output. ➜ rpmbuild rpmlint SPECS/rubygem-gem-open.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ➜ rpmbuild rpmlint SRPMS/rubygem-gem-open-0.1.3-1.fc17.src.rpm rubygem-gem-open.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + Changelog.
I can't tell which version of the ruby packaging guidelines to which this was written. It certainly isn't the current ones since this package predates them, nor does it appear to be the ones which are current for any Fedora release. Please consider updating this package to current ruby guidelines.
Hi Jan, are you still interested in packaging this?
As there has been no response to the needinfo from the requester in over a week this bug is being closed as per policy. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews