Bug 68545
Summary: | Would like to see an /etc/init.d script for fetchmail | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Martin Jackson <mhjacks> |
Component: | fetchmail | Assignee: | Miloslav Trmač <mitr> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Brock Organ <borgan> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 8.0 | CC: | wtogami |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-06-21 20:35:58 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Martin Jackson
2002-07-11 02:14:45 UTC
I second the motion for fetchmail in /etc/init.d. Secondary package not necessary though, because wouldn't that be really tiny? K.I.S.S. Yes, I also think that adding a service script for fetchmail is a good idea. I'm sorry about the late response. Given the intrinsic reliability problems with running fetchmail unattended (if a bounce message can't be sent, the mail is lost without a trace) and the expected limited usage of fetchmail in such a scenario, I don't think adding this feature is worth it, with all the set up necessary to run fetchmail under a non-root user. A different way to get equivalent functionality is to create a local "fetchmail" user and add fetchmail -d $timeout 2>&1 |grep -v 'while a background fetchmail is running' to crontab of the "fetchmail" user. |