Bug 693317

Summary:	Review Request: emacs-flim - Basic library for handling email messages for Emacs
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Michel Alexandre Salim <michel>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fedora-package-review, msuchy, notting, petersen, tagoh
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	notready
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-02-19 10:43:36 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	201449

Description Michel Alexandre Salim 2011-04-04 10:18:26 UTC

Spec: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/devtools/emacs-flim.spec
SRPM:
http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/devtools/emacs-flim-1.14.9-3.fc15.src.rpm
Description:

 FLIM is a library to provide basic features about message representation and
 encoding for Emacs.

This is a reworking of the original flim package, complying with the new Emacs packaging guidelines. Also, xemacs support has been dropped since emacs-apel, which this depends on, no longer supports it either.

Comment 1 Michel Alexandre Salim 2011-04-04 10:19:29 UTC

*** Bug 658338 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Jens Petersen 2011-04-05 01:53:50 UTC

Taking this rename review.

Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2011-05-12 04:42:34 UTC

Sorry for the long delay, finally had a chance to look at the package.

I think xemacs-w3m still requires flim-xemacs so
it would be better to keep xemacs support and rename
this package to emacs-common-flim and let xemacs-flim
obsolete and provide flim-xemacs.

Comment 4 Jens Petersen 2011-06-24 01:19:36 UTC

Another ping

Comment 5 Michel Alexandre Salim 2011-08-01 00:44:59 UTC

Been busy; apologies. Will try and take a look in the next couple of days.

Not sure how xemacs support would work, if flim requires apel and apel no longer supports xemacs -- I'll have to give this some testing.

Comment 6 Jens Petersen 2011-09-02 05:09:54 UTC

(In reply to comment #5)
> Not sure how xemacs support would work, if flim requires apel and apel no
> longer supports xemacs -- I'll have to give this some testing.

xemacs-packages-extra provides apel-xemacs at least.

Since flim is only needed by emacs-w3m, I also asked Tagoh-san
if he is interested in owning emacs-common-flim.

Comment 7 Akira TAGOH 2011-09-02 05:30:25 UTC

(In reply to comment #6)
> xemacs-packages-extra provides apel-xemacs at least.

That's true. this is why emacs-apel doesn't provide a subpackage for xemacs to avoid the conflict. anyway, that change has been mode some years ago though.

> Since flim is only needed by emacs-w3m, I also asked Tagoh-san
> if he is interested in owning emacs-common-flim.

I don't mind either. I'm not keen to keep the owner of emacs-w3m either, because I rarely use it these days.

Comment 8 Miroslav Suchý 2012-12-16 13:22:28 UTC

Ping? Any progress here? Or we can close this review?

Comment 9 Miroslav Suchý 2013-02-19 10:43:36 UTC

Stalled Review. Closing per:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
If you ever want to continue in this review, please reopen or
submit new review.