Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||Review Request: emacs-flim - Basic library for handling email messages for Emacs|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Michel Alexandre Salim <michel>|
|Component:||Package Review||Assignee:||Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>|
|Status:||CLOSED NOTABUG||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||fedora-package-review, msuchy, notting, petersen, tagoh|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2013-02-19 05:43:36 EST||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Michel Alexandre Salim 2011-04-04 06:18:26 EDT
Spec: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/devtools/emacs-flim.spec SRPM: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/devtools/emacs-flim-1.14.9-3.fc15.src.rpm Description: FLIM is a library to provide basic features about message representation and encoding for Emacs. This is a reworking of the original flim package, complying with the new Emacs packaging guidelines. Also, xemacs support has been dropped since emacs-apel, which this depends on, no longer supports it either.
Comment 1 Michel Alexandre Salim 2011-04-04 06:19:29 EDT
*** Bug 658338 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Jens Petersen 2011-04-04 21:53:50 EDT
Taking this rename review.
Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2011-05-12 00:42:34 EDT
Sorry for the long delay, finally had a chance to look at the package. I think xemacs-w3m still requires flim-xemacs so it would be better to keep xemacs support and rename this package to emacs-common-flim and let xemacs-flim obsolete and provide flim-xemacs.
Comment 4 Jens Petersen 2011-06-23 21:19:36 EDT
Comment 5 Michel Alexandre Salim 2011-07-31 20:44:59 EDT
Been busy; apologies. Will try and take a look in the next couple of days. Not sure how xemacs support would work, if flim requires apel and apel no longer supports xemacs -- I'll have to give this some testing.
Comment 6 Jens Petersen 2011-09-02 01:09:54 EDT
(In reply to comment #5) > Not sure how xemacs support would work, if flim requires apel and apel no > longer supports xemacs -- I'll have to give this some testing. xemacs-packages-extra provides apel-xemacs at least. Since flim is only needed by emacs-w3m, I also asked Tagoh-san if he is interested in owning emacs-common-flim.
Comment 7 Akira TAGOH 2011-09-02 01:30:25 EDT
(In reply to comment #6) > xemacs-packages-extra provides apel-xemacs at least. That's true. this is why emacs-apel doesn't provide a subpackage for xemacs to avoid the conflict. anyway, that change has been mode some years ago though. > Since flim is only needed by emacs-w3m, I also asked Tagoh-san > if he is interested in owning emacs-common-flim. I don't mind either. I'm not keen to keep the owner of emacs-w3m either, because I rarely use it these days.
Comment 8 Miroslav Suchý 2012-12-16 08:22:28 EST
Ping? Any progress here? Or we can close this review?
Comment 9 Miroslav Suchý 2013-02-19 05:43:36 EST
Stalled Review. Closing per: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews If you ever want to continue in this review, please reopen or submit new review.