Bug 69621

Summary: imap in rawhide section is out of date
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide Reporter: Marcel Mol <marcel>
Component: imapAssignee: Mike A. Harris <mharris>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 1.0   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-07-24 05:05:15 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Marcel Mol 2002-07-23 20:17:20 UTC 
Description of Problem:
The imap version in all redhat 7.x ditsributions is imap-2001a
but rawhide still contains imap-2000c

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How Reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. ftp to the ftp.redhat.com
2. cd to the rawhide RPMS directory
3. dir imap*

Actual Results:
-rw-r--r--    1 500      500      1173548   Sep  7  2001   imap-2000c-15.i386.rpm
-rw-r--r--    1 500      500      1224042   Sep  7  2001  
imap-devel-2000c-15.i386.rpm


Expected Results:
something with imap-2001...

Additional Information:
not really a bug but just a bit annoying. At the time Limbo was
released Rawhide practically contained the same rpms except for the imap
rpms...
Comment 1 Mike A. Harris 2002-07-24 05:05:09 UTC 
imap 2001a-13 is in the internal rawhide tree: imap-2001a-13.src.rpm

Logging into the ftpsite...

ncftp ...ux/rawhide/SRPMS/SRPMS > dir imap*
-rw-r--r--    1 529      529       882509   Sep  7  2001   imap-2000c-15.src.rpm
ncftp ...ux/rawhide/SRPMS/SRPMS > pwd
  ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide/SRPMS/SRPMS/

Hrrrmmm....   something is awry.
Comment 2 Mike A. Harris 2002-07-24 05:06:46 UTC 
Looks like some sort of internal synchronization problem occured between
our internal tree and external rawhide.  It's fixed now I'm told.

Thanks for reporting, please let us know if you see any other inconsistencies.